基础医学与临床 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 1896-1900.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2023.12.1896

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京协和医学院“精准治疗下的肿瘤学”课程教学实践

贾楠1,2#, 檀厚睿3#, 严毅飞4, 何仲2, 姚顺宇2, 王颖轶1*   

  1. 1.中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院; 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 2.人文和社会科学学院;
    3.临床医学专业(八年制);
    4.研究生院, 北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-19 修回日期:2023-02-22 出版日期:2023-12-05 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: * wangyingyidaifu@163.com
  • 作者简介:#对本文有相同贡献
  • 基金资助:
    2022年北京高等教育“本科教学改革创新项目”(202210023002);2022年度校级本科教育教学改革项目(2022zlgc0102)

Teaching practice of “Precision Treatment for Oncology” course in Peking Union Medical College

JIA Nan1,2#, TAN Hourui3#, YAN Yifei4, HE Zhong2, YAO Shunyu2, WANG Yingyi1*   

  1. 1. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS & PUMC;
    2. School of Humanities and Social Sciences;
    3. Eight-year Medical Doctor Program;
    4. Graduate School,CAMS & PUMC,Beijing 100730,China
  • Received:2022-08-19 Revised:2023-02-22 Online:2023-12-05 Published:2023-11-29
  • Contact: * wangyingyidaifu@163.com

摘要: 目的 对北京协和医学院首次开设的“精准治疗下的肿瘤学”课程进行调研,以吸纳学生意见和建议、优化课程设置、提高教学质量。方法 于2021年12月—2022年2月采用问卷调查和访谈两种形式调研,对问卷资料进行统计学分析,对访谈资料进行归类编码。结果 共纳入问卷定量资料36份,访谈定性资料5份。提升专业知识和个人兴趣爱好成为学生选课的两大重要原因,对课程评价的不同方面偏重有统计学差异。医学研究生对课程总体评分9.22分,94.4%的学生认为课程达到预期效果,学生学习兴趣得到提高。学生对教师授课态度、课程内容的前沿性和实用性的评分分别为9.81、9.08和8.86分,未来希望增加病例分析实践和专题讨论活动,丰富教学形式。结论 本课程作为研究生选修课程,首次开课受到学生的认可和接纳。未来可在了解学生核心诉求的前提下,优化课程设置、创新教学方法、提高教学质量,探索医学研究生教育的全新路径。

关键词: 医学教育, 精准治疗下的肿瘤学, 医学研究生, 课程评价

Abstract: Objective To investigate the “Precision Treatment for Oncology” course, which is offered by Peking Union Medical College.The course is aiming for collecting students′ opinions and suggestions to optimize the course setting and improve the teaching quality. Methods This investigation collected data by questionnaire survey and interviewing from Dec.2021 to Feb.2022. The questionnaire data and interview data were analysed. Results Thirty-six quantitative questionnaires and five qualitative questionnaires were included. Improving professional knowledge and personal interests were two main reasons for students to choose courses, which existed statistical differences on different aspects of course evaluation. The overall score evaluated by medical students was 9.22 and 94.4% of the students thought the course achieved the desired goal. The scores of teachers′ teaching attitude, frontier and practicality of course content were 9.81, 9.08 and 8.86 points respectively. The students hoped to increase the case analysis practice and thematic discussion activities to enrich the teaching form. Conclusions This elective course for graduate is recognized and accepted by students. More efforts are needed in future to optimize curriculum settings, innovate teaching methods, improve teaching quality and explore new pathways for medical graduate education matching the needs of students.

Key words: medical education, precision treatment for oncology, medical postgraduate, course evaluation

中图分类号: