联合TRUS和CEUS建立对前列腺外周带病变良恶性的预测模型

doi:10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2023.09.1432

基础医学与临床 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 1432-1438.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2023.09.1432

联合TRUS和CEUS建立对前列腺外周带病变良恶性的预测模型

孙亚¹, 石艳萍¹, 李华蓉¹, 王嘉俊¹, 徐井旭², 梁蕾^1*

1.航天中心医院超声医学科,北京 100049;
2.北京深睿博联科技有限责任公司研究协作部研发部,北京 100080

收稿日期:2022-09-30 修回日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-09-05 发布日期:2023-09-01
通讯作者: ^*lianglei_csk@126.com
基金资助:
北京市海淀区卫生健康发展科研培育项目(HP2021-32-50702);航天中心医院科研基金(YN202105)

Establishment of a predictive model for benign and malignant prostatic peripheral lesions by combined TRUS and CEUS

SUN Ya¹, SHI Yanping¹, LI Huarong¹, WANG Jiajun¹, XU Jingxu², LIANG Lei^1*

1. Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049;
2. Department of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100080, China

Received:2022-09-30 Revised:2022-12-27 Online:2023-09-05 Published:2023-09-01
Contact: ^*lianglei_csk@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的建立联合经直肠超声(TRUS)常规二维模型(B型)和超声造影(CEUS)预测前列腺外周带病变良恶性的机器学习模型。方法回顾性分析了109例前列腺外周带病灶,良性45例,恶性64例,均以超声引导下靶向穿刺活检病理作为金标准。使用Sonoliver软件获得病变处造影的时间-强度曲线,得到以下参数:峰值强度(IMAX)、上升时间 (RT)、达峰时间 (TTP)和平均渡越时间 (MTT)。收集患者的相关危险因素,包括年龄、总血清前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)、游离前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA)、游离/总前列腺特异性抗原(f/tPSA)、前列腺体积和前列腺特异性抗原密度 (PSAD)。分别运用特征相关性分析和多元Logistic回归进行影像组学的特征筛选和建模。结果最终筛选出32个特征,建立了3种影像组学相关诊断模型(B模型、CEUS模型、B-CEUS联合模型),得到3种不同的影像组学评分。其中,年龄、PSAD和RT是预测前列腺外周带病灶良恶性的独立危险因素(P＜0.05)。B模型、CEUS型、B-CEUS联合型、危险因素模型、危险因素-影像组学联合模型的诊断准确性分别为0.75、0.71、0.73、0.70、0.84;诊断的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.79、0.75、0.84、0.79、0.91。危险因素-影像组学联合模型在验证集中有显著优势(P＜0.05)。结论联合TRUS和CEUS及相关危险因素的机器学习模型可以较好的预测前列腺外周带病变的良恶性,对临床诊断有一定价值。

关键词: 超声造影(CEUS), 前列腺, 外周带, 影像组学

Abstract: Objective To construct a machine learning model based on radiomics features by combing conventional B-mode transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)in order to improve prostate cancer (PCa) detection in the peripheral zone, and to explore its clinical application value. Methods A retrospective study of 109 cases (45 benign, 64 malignant lesions) with targeted biopsy-confirmed pathology who underwent B-mode and CEUS examinations was performed. Time-intensity curves were obtained using Sonoliver software forall lesions in regions of interest. The following parameters were collected: the maximum intensity (IMAX), the rise time (RT), the time to peak (TTP), and the mean transit time (MTT). Clinical risk factors, including age, serum total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free PSA(fPSA), f/t PSA, prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), were collected. Feature selection and model construction were carried out by feature correlation analysis and multivariable Logistic regression analysis, respectively. Results Finally, 32 features were screened out by the radiomics models. Three radiomics models (B model, CEUS model and B-CEUS combined model) were established by logistic regression, and radiomics scores were obtained at the same time. The risk factors like age, PSAD, and RT were significant independent predictors (P＜0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of B model, CEUS model, B-CEUS combined model, risk factor model and risk factor-radiomics combined model were 0.75, 0.71, 0.73, 0.70 and 0.84, respectively, and the area under the curves(AUC) were 0.79, 0.75, 0.84, 0.79 and 0.91, respectively. The risk factor-radiomics combined model had a significant significance in the validation cohort (P＜0.05). Conclusions The machine learning model combined with conventional B-mode TRUS, CEUS, and relevant clinical factors can better predict the benign and malignant prostate peripheral lesions, which may significantly support clinical decision-making.

Key words: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), prostate, peripheral zone, radiomics

中图分类号:

R737.25

孙亚, 石艳萍, 李华蓉, 王嘉俊, 徐井旭, 梁蕾. 联合TRUS和CEUS建立对前列腺外周带病变良恶性的预测模型[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2023, 43(9): 1432-1438.

SUN Ya, SHI Yanping, LI Huarong, WANG Jiajun, XU Jingxu, LIANG Lei. Establishment of a predictive model for benign and malignant prostatic peripheral lesions by combined TRUS and CEUS[J]. Basic & Clinical Medicine, 2023, 43(9): 1432-1438.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://journal11.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_jcyxylc/CN/10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2023.09.1432

http://journal11.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_jcyxylc/CN/Y2023/V43/I9/1432

参考文献

[1]Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68: 394-424.
[2]McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, et al. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1988, 12:897-906.
[3]Chen T, Wang F, Chen H, et al. Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22:64. doi:10.1186/s12894-022-01013-8.
[4]唐杰,汪娜,李欣,等. 经直肠超声引导穿刺活检研究前列腺外周带增生[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2004, 13:121-123.
[5]薛念余,程跃,张盛敏,等. 经直肠剪切波弹性成像技术在前列腺外周带低回声结节诊断中的价值[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40:62-63.
[6]Li Y, Tang J, Fei X, et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with prostate cancer:a meta-analysis[J]. Acad Radiol,2013,20:156-164.
[7]Bono AV, Celato N, Cova V, et al. Microvessel density in prostate carcinoma[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2002, 5: 123-127.
[8]Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79:243-262.
[9]Jung EM, Wiggermann P, Greis C, et al. First results of endocavity evaluation of the microvascularization of malignant prostate tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) including perfusion analysis: first results[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 52:167-177.
[10]徐辉雄,郭乐杭.前列腺超声造影临床应用指南(2012)解读[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2014,11:105-107.

[1]	刘彼得, 李循, 王书恒, 靳宏勇, 张小安, 李九智. miR-146a-5p靶向SMAD4抑制人前列腺癌细胞系PC-3增殖和侵袭[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2023, 43(8): 1215-1221.
[2]	周智恩, 梁震, 严维刚, 周毅, 左宇志, 石冰冰. 经会阴前列腺穿刺活组织检查的阶梯式培训模式[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(7): 1160-1163.
[3]	周智恩, 严维刚, 周毅, 左宇志, 梁震. 拼图(Jigasaw)教学法应用于前列腺靶向穿刺教学中的效果评估[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(5): 844-847.
[4]	左宇志, 严维刚. 抗血栓药物的应用与前列腺穿刺活检术的安全性[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(5): 824-827.
[5]	刘冬梅, 徐强, 李峰. 土荆皮乙酸诱导人前列腺癌细胞系DU145凋亡[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(10): 1555-1560.
[6]	冯天瑞, 严维刚. 环状RNAs在前列腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(1): 179-183.
[7]	陈号, 陈韬, 吴静. IL-6/JAK/STAT3信号通路在前列腺癌发展和治疗中的研究进展[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(1): 159-162.
[8]	李英杰, 杨庭楷, 纪志刚, 文进. 外泌体在前列腺癌诊疗中的研究进展[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(1): 163-167.
[9]	程继, 付国, 赵华才, 王志刚, 高丹, 董青川. 姜黄素提高人前列腺癌细胞系PC-3放疗敏感性[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2021, 41(12): 1792-1796.
[10]	王小玲吕合作甘怀勇项平张小凤徐二琴裴晓艳金国玺. Treg在亚急性甲状腺炎发病免疫机制中的作用[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2018, 38(2): 218-223.
[11]	张效通段建敏王培龙巩进伟. FBI-1基因在前列腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2014, 34(12): 1728-1731.
[12]	乔小芝杨丽爱俞玲娣周飞雪. 代谢综合征与前列腺增生症的关系[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2012, 32(10): 1239-1242.
[13]	李炳蔚苑晓晨李宏伟修瑞娟. 15d-PGJ2减弱香烟提取物抑制人脐静脉内皮细胞迁移[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2011, 31(4): 393-399.
[14]	周智恩李汉忠严维刚. 雄激素受体蛋白表达及其基因获得/缺失与前列腺癌预后的相关性[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2010, 30(8): 857-861.
[15]	严维刚;李汉忠;周毅;崔全才. 前列腺癌空间分布特点的临床分析[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2010, 30(12): 1325-1328.

联合TRUS和CEUS建立对前列腺外周带病变良恶性的预测模型

Establishment of a predictive model for benign and malignant prostatic peripheral lesions by combined TRUS and CEUS

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价