Preliminary clinical study on cisternal intracranial pressure monitoring after craniotomy in traumatic brain injury

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.07.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the feasibility and accuracy of cisternal intracranial pressure (ICPc) monitoring after craniotomy in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods Four TBI patients underwent evacuation of hematoma were enrolled from May 2019 to July 2020. Ventriculostomy and cisternotomy were performed besides evacuation, and intracranial pressure (ICP) were monitored via the methods of extraventricular drainage (EVD) and cisternal drainage (CD) simultaneously for 7 d after craniotomy. The correlation and consistency between ICPc and ventricular ICP (ICPv) were observed. Results The mean values of ICPv were (14.72 ±5.98), (11.10 ±4.49), (27.29 ±6.06) and (12.63 ±5.36) mm Hg, respectively. The mean values of ICPc were (14.32 ±5.44), (11.20 ±4.36), (25.46 ±5.00) and (12.46 ±5.21) mm Hg, respectively. The correlation coefficients were 0.977 (P=0.000), 0.961 (P=0.000), 0.892 (P=0.000) and 0.970 (P=0.000), respectively. Using Bland-Altman consistency evaluation, the mean ICP difference between ICPv and ICPc was (0.21 ±1.36) mm Hg, 95% LoA was-2.440-2.870 (P=0.003). Conclusions ICPc and ICPv have good linear correlation and consistency. ICP monitoring through the method of cisternotomy and drainage can be applied to the clinical management of patients with TBI, and is likely to become an alternative method for ICPv.

Key words: Brain injuries, traumatic, Intracranial pressure, Cerebrospinal fluid, Drainage

摘要：

目的初步探讨颅脑创伤开颅手术后脑池开放引流监测颅内压（ICPc）与脑室外引流监测颅内压（ICPv）的相关性和一致性。方法以2019年5月至2020年7月行开颅血肿清除术的4例颅脑创伤患者作为观察对象，术后第1~7天同时行脑池开放引流和脑室外引流颅内压监测，Pearson相关分析和Bland-Altman一致性检验探讨二者的相关性和一致性。结果 4例患者术后分别获得有效颅内压测值106、87、56和99次，脑室外引流颅内压测值分别为（14.72 ±5.98）、（11.10 ±4.49）、（27.29 ±6.06）和（12.63 ±5.36）mm Hg，脑池开放引流测值为（14.32 ±5.44）、（11.20 ±4.36）、（25.46 ±5.00）和（12.46 ±5.21）mm Hg。4例患者术后脑池开放引流与脑室外引流颅内压均呈正相关（r=0.977，P=0.000；r=0.961，P=0.000；r=0.892，P=0.000；r=0.970，P=0.000）；二者平均差值为（0.21 ±1.36）mm Hg，95% LoA为-2.440~2.870（P=0.003）。结论脑室外引流与脑池开放引流颅内压监测具有良好的相关性和一致性，脑池开放引流颅内压监测可用于颅脑创伤患者的临床诊断与治疗，并有望成为脑室外引流颅内压监测的备选方案。

关键词: 脑损伤, 创伤性, 颅内压, 脑脊髓液, 引流术

LIU Jun, ZHANG Shu-sheng, WANG Wei, GUO Fang, WANG Jun-wei, WANG Bo, LI Zhong-zhen, ZHANG Guo-bin. Preliminary clinical study on cisternal intracranial pressure monitoring after craniotomy in traumatic brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2020, 20(7): 597-601.

刘俊, 张述升, 王伟, 郭芳, 王均伟, 王博, 李中振, 张国斌. 颅脑创伤开颅手术后脑池颅内压监测初步探讨[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(7): 597-601.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.07.007

https://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/EN/Y2020/V20/I7/597

References

[1] Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition[J]. Neurosurgery, 2017, 80:6-15.
[2] Farahvar A, Gerber LM, Chiu YL, Carney N, Härtl R, Ghajar J.Increased mortality in patient with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring[J]. J Neurosurg, 2012, 117:729-734.
[3] Padayachy LC, Figaji AA, Bullock MR. Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in themodern era[J].Childs Nerv Syst, 2010, 26:441-452.
[4] Cherian I, Beltran M, Landi A, Alafaci C, Torregrossa F, Grasso G. Introducing the concept of "CSF-shift edema" in traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosci Res, 2018,96:744-752.
[5] Jiang JY. The future of diagnosis and treatment of brain trauma in China[J]. Zhonghua Shen Jing Chuang Shang Dian Zi Za Zhi, 2019, 5:257-259.[江基尧. 中国颅脑创伤诊治的未来[J].中华神经创伤电子杂志, 2019, 5:257-259.]
[6] Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J, Machamer J, Chaddock K, Celix JM, Cherner M, Hendrix T; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367:2471-2481.
[7] Abraham P, Rennert RC, Gabel BC, Sack JA, Karanjia N, Warnke P, Chen CC. ICP management in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury:a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2017, 159:2279-2287.
[8] Hawryluk GW, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper DJ, Arrastia RD, Diringer M, Figaji A, Gao G, Geocadin R, Ghajar J, Harris O, Hoffer A, Hutchinson P, Joseph M, Kitagawa R, Manley G, Mayer S, Menon DK, Meyfroidt G, Michael DB, Oddo M, Okonkwo D, Patel M, Robertson C, Rosenfeld JV, Rubiano AM, Sahuquillo J, Servadei F, Shutter L, Stein D, Stocchetti N, Taccone FS, Timmons S, Tsai E, Ullman JS, Vespa P, Videtta W, Wright DW, Zammit C, Chesnut RM. A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring:the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2019, 45:1783-1794.
[9] Dash PK, Zhao J, Hergenroeder G, Moore AN. Biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment efficacy for traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2010, 7:100-114.
[10] Mehta A, Kochanek PM, Tyler-Kabara E, Adelson PD, Wisniewski SR, Berger RP, Sidoni MD, Bell RL, Clark RS, Bell MJ. Relationship of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure with outcome in young children after severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Dev Neurosci, 2010, 32:413-419.
[11] Bauer DF, Razdan SN, Bartolucci AA, Markert JM. Meta -analysis of hemorrhagic complications from ventriculostomy placement by neurosurgeons[J]. Neurosurgery, 2011, 69:255-260.
[12] Tavakoli S, Peitz G, Ares W, Hafeez S, Grandhi R.Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 43:E6.
[13] Liu J, Gao LD. The vaue of drainage of basic ranial pool in severe cranio cerebral trauma[J]. Zhonghua Chuang Shang Za Zhi, 1995, 5:309-310.[刘健, 高立达. 脑基底池引流在重型颅脑损伤的价值[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 1995, 5:309-310.]
[14] Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, Benveniste H, Vates GE, Deane R, Goldman SA, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M. A paravascular pathway facilitates csf flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2012, 4:147ra111.
[15] Mestre H, Mori Y, Nedergaard M. The brain's glymphatic system:current controversies[J]. Trends Neurosci, 2020, 43:458-466.
[16] Cherian I, Grasso G, Bernardo A, Munakomi S. Anatomy and physiology of cisternostomy[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2016, 19:7-10.
[17] Wang YH, Liang L, Sun JY, Guo M, Yang H, Yang ZP, Niu XM, Liu ZY, Wang XY, Gong HB. Effect of cisternostomy on prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury[J]. Zhonghua Chuang Shang Za Zhi, 2019, 5:389-393.[王永红, 梁磊, 孙杰源, 郭敏, 杨辉, 杨忠平, 牛小敏, 刘震洋, 王向阳, 仝海波. 脑池造瘘术对创伤性脑损伤患者预后的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019, 5:389-393.]

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export