Value of ventricular intracranial pressure monitoring and process management for traumatic bifrontal contusions

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2022.04.014

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To investigate clinical efficacy and optimal therapeutic strategy for ventricular intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and process management in patients with traumatic bifrontal contusions (TBC). Methods Total 387 TBC patients between January 2010 and January 2016 were enrolled in 904th Hospital of Chinese PLA, in which 105 patients with TBC who underwent ventricular ICP monitoring (ICP group) and 282 patients with TBC who did not (non-ICP group). Conservative treatment and surgical treatment were performed respectively (unilateral craniotomy for contusion and hematoma removal, bilateral craniotomy for contusion and hematoma removal, and decompressive craniotomy). Rates of successful conservative treatment, ratio of bilateral craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy, length of stay, medical expenses and incidence of related complications were compared between 2 groups. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to assess all patients after 6 months follow-up. Results Compared with non-ICP group, ICP group had a significantly better successful conservative treatment rate[64.76% (68/105) vs. 47.16% (133/282); χ²=9.493, P=0.002], lower decompressive craniectomy rate[8.11% (3/37) vs. 23.49% (35/149); χ²=4.314, P=0.038]; shorter length of stay[(13.22 ± 1.83) d vs. (18.51 ± 5.08) d; t=10.410, P=0.000] and lower medical expenses[(8.34 ± 3.26) ten thousand yuan vs. (9.67 ± 4.42) ten thousand yuan; t=2.811, P=0.004]. No significantly difference in operative methods (χ²=2.673, P=0.102), pulmonary infection[33.33% (35/105) vs. 39.72% (112/282); χ²=1.321, P=0.250], intracranial infection[10.47% (11/105) vs. 8.16% (23/282); χ²=0.513, P=0.473], hydrocephalus[3.81% (4/105) vs. 6.74% (19/282); χ²=1.173, P=0.279], epilepsy[6.67% (7/105) vs. 10.99% (31/282); χ²=1.617, P=0.203] and bradycardia[28.57% (30/105) vs. 34.75% (98/282); χ²=1.320, P=0.251]. There were no significant differences in prognosis between 2 groups (χ²=1.492, P=0.474). Conclusions Condition of patients with TBC progresses rapidly. Patients should undergo ventricular ICP probe implantation in a timely manner. Although ventricular ICP monitoring do not significantly improve the prognosis of patients, it can increase the success rate of conservative treatment, reduce the rate of decompressive craniectomy, shorten the length of stay, and reduce the medial expenses. Ventricular ICP monitoring warrants further clinical research.

Key words: Brain contusion, Frontal lobe, Intracranial pressure, Neurosurgical procedures

摘要： 目的探讨脑室型颅内压监测及相关流程管理在双侧额叶挫裂伤中的应用价值。方法纳入2010年1月至2016年1月解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院收治的387例双侧额叶挫裂伤患者,105例行脑室型颅内压监测(ICP组)、282例未行脑室型颅内压监测(无ICP组),分别接受保守治疗和手术治疗(包括单侧开颅挫裂伤和血肿清除术、双侧开颅挫裂伤和血肿清除术、去骨瓣减压术),记录保守治疗成功率、双侧开颅手术和去骨瓣减压术比例、住院时间、住院费用以及住院期间相关并发症发生率,术后6个月采用Glasgow预后分级评价预后。结果与无ICP组相比,ICP组保守治疗成功率较高[64.76%(68/105)对47.16%(133/282);χ²=9.493,P=0.002],去骨瓣减压术比例较低[8.11%(3/37)对23.49%(35/149);χ²=4.314,P=0.038],住院时间较短[(13.22 ± 1.83) d对(18.51 ± 5.08) d;t=10.410,P=0.000],住院费用较低[(8.34 ± 3.26)万元对(9.67 ± 4.42)万元;t=2.811,P=0.005];而手术方式(χ²=2.673,P=0.102),住院期间肺部感染[33.33%(35/105)对39.72%(112/282);χ²=1.321,P=0.250]、颅内感染[10.48%(11/105)对8.16%(23/282);χ²=0.513,P=0.473]、脑积水[3.81%(4/105)对6.74%(19/282);χ²=1.173,P=0.279]、癫发作[6.67%(7/105)对10.99%(31/282);χ²=1.617,P=0.203]、心动过缓[28.57%(30/105)对34.75%(98/282);χ²=1.320,P=0.251]发生率,预后差异均无统计学意义(χ²=1.492,P=0.474)。结论双侧额叶挫裂伤患者病情进展迅速,应及时行脑室型颅内压监测并流程管理。虽然脑室型颅内压监测无法改善最终预后,但可增加保守治疗成功率、降低去骨瓣减压术比例、缩短住院时间、减少住院费用,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 脑挫伤, 额叶, 颅内压, 神经外科手术

FENG Xiao-yan, JIAO Wei, CHEN Jun-hui, SHI Zhong-hua, SHI Ya-qin, WANG Yu-hai. Value of ventricular intracranial pressure monitoring and process management for traumatic bifrontal contusions[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2022, 22(4): 313-318.

封晓燕, 焦薇, 陈军辉, 时忠华, 史亚琴, 王玉海. 脑室型颅内压监测及流程管理在双侧额叶挫裂伤治疗中的价值[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(4): 313-318.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2022.04.014

https://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/EN/Y2022/V22/I4/313

References

[1] Roozenbeek B, Maas AI, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2013, 9:231-236.
[2] Chen JH, Li PP, Yang LK, Chen L, Zhu J, Hu X, Wang YH. Value of ventricular intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic bifrontal contusions[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 113:e690-701.
[3] Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic brain injuryrelated emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deathsUnited States, 2007 and 2013[J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2017, 66:1-16.
[4] Zhao YD, Wang W. Neurosurgical trauma in People's Republic of China[J]. World J Surg, 2001, 25:1202-1204.
[5] Cole TB. Global road safety crisis remedy sought:1.2 million killed, 50 million injured annually[J]. JAMA, 2004, 291:2531-2532.
[6] Hung KS, Liang CL, Wang CH, Chang HW, Park N, Juo SH. Outcome after traumatic frontal intracerebral haemorrhage:a comparison of unilateral and bilateral haematomas[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2004, 11:849-853.
[7] Van de Zande N, Manivannan S, Sharouf F, Shastin D, Abdulla M, Chumas PD, Zaben M. Demographics, presentation, and clinical outcomes after traumatic bifrontal contusions:a systematic review[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2020, 43:977-986.
[8] Zhaofeng L, Bing L, Peng Q, Jiyao J. Surgical treatment of traumatic bifrontal contusions:when and how[J]?World Neurosurg, 2016, 93:261-269.
[9] Chesnut R, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper DJ, Arrastia RD, Diringer M, Figaji A, Gao G, Geocadin R, Ghajar J, Harris O, Hoffer A, Hutchinson P, Joseph M, Kitagawa R, Manley G, Mayer S, Menon DK, Meyfroidt G, Michael DB, Oddo M, Okonkwo D, Patel M, Robertson C, Rosenfeld JV, Rubiano AM, Sahuquillo J, Servadei F, Shutter L, Stein D, Stocchetti N, Taccone FS, Timmons S, Tsai E, Ullman JS, Vespa P, Videtta W, Wright DW, Zammit C, Hawryluk GWJ. A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring:the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46:919-929.
[10] Chau CYC, Craven CL, Rubiano AM, Adams H, Tülü S, Czosnyka M, Servadei F, Ercole A, Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG. The evolution of the role of external ventricular drainage in traumatic brain injury[J]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8:1422.
[11] Chen J, Li M, Chen L, Chen W, Zhang C, Feng Y, Wang Y, Chen Q. The effect of controlled decompression for severe traumatic brain injury:a randomized, controlled trial[J]. Front Neurol, 2020, 11:107.
[12] He J, Chen J, Wu T, Zhang C, Yang L, Shi ZH, Wang YH. The value of managing severe traumatic brain injury during the perioperative period using intracranial pressure monitoring[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2019, 30:2217-2223.
[13] Sahuquillo J, Dennis JA. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of high intracranial pressure in closed traumatic brain injury[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 12:CD003983.
[14] Lu S, Du T, Sun Z, Xu L, Tong X, Yan H. Timing of extremity fracture fixation in patients with traumatic brain injury:a metaanalysis of prognosis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 133:227-236.
[15] Liu J, Zhang SS, Wang W, Guo F, Wang JW, Wang B, Li ZZ, Zhang GB. Preliminary clinical study on cisternal intracranial pressure monitoring after craniotomy in traumatic brain injury[J].Zhongguo Xian Dai Shen Jing Ji Bing Za Zhi, 2020, 20:597-601.[刘俊,张述升,王伟,郭芳,王钧伟,王博,李中振,张国斌.颅脑创伤开颅手术后脑池颅内压监测初步探讨[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20:597-601.]
[16] Qi HW, Zeng WJ, Ren YP. Research progress of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring technology[J]. Zhongguo Wei Qin Xi Shen Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2020, 25:281-284.[齐洪武,曾维俊,任胤朋.有创颅内压监测技术的研究进展[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2020, 25:281-284.]
[17] Gelabert-González M, Ginesta-Galan V, Sernamito-García R, Allut AG, Bandin-Diéguez J, Rumbo RM. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice:assessment in a 1000 cases[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2006, 148:435-441.
[18] Al-Tamimi YZ, Helmy A, Bavetta S, Price SJ. Assessment of zero drift in the Codman intracranial pressure monitor:a study from 2 neurointensive care units[J]. Neurosurgery, 2009, 64:94-99.
[19] Rehman T, Ali R, Tawil I, Yonas H. Rapid progression of traumatic bifrontal contusions to transtentorial herniation:a case report[J]. Cases J, 2008, 1:203.
[20] Che XR, Wang YJ, Zheng HY. Prognostic value of intracranial pressure monitoring for the management of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage following minimally invasive surgery[J]. World J Emerg Med, 2020, 11:169-173.
[21] Al Saiegh F, Philipp L, Mouchtouris N, Chalouhi N, Khanna O, Shah SO, Jallo J. Comparison of outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury in 36, 929 patients treated with or without intracranial pressure monitoring in a mature trauma system[J].World Neurosurg, 2020, 136:e535-541.
[22] Liu H, Wang W, Cheng F, Yuan Q, Yang J, Hu J, Ren G. External ventricular drains versus intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitors in traumatic brain injury:a prospective observational study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83:794-800.
[23] Sun Z, Wu L, Liu Z, Zhong W, Kou Z, Liu J. Optimizing accuracy of freehand cannulation of the ipsilateral ventricle for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with brain trauma[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020, 10:2144-2156.
[24] Ekeh AP, Ilyas S, Saxe JM, Whitmill M, Parikh P, Schweitzer JS, McCarthy MC. Successful placement of intracranial pressure monitors by trauma surgeons[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014, 76:286-290.
[25] Khanna O, Baldassari MP, Al Saiegh F, Mouchtouris N, Ghosh R, Theofanis TN, Evans JJ, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour PM, Gooch MR. Ultrasound-guided ventricular puncture during cranioplasty[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 146:e779-785.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export