慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通失败原因分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.06.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的分析慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通失败的原因及其影响因素。方法纳入2012年12月至2019年12月接受血管再通治疗的103例慢性颈内动脉闭塞患者，分析其血管再通失败原因（性别、年龄、基础疾病、闭塞至血管再通治疗时间、闭塞近端残端形态和远端反流位置），单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析筛查血管再通失败相关影响因素。结果 103例患者中33例（32.04%）血管再通失败，1例（0.97%）术中发生蛛网膜下腔出血致严重头痛。Logistic回归分析显示，闭塞近端残端形态呈非尖头型（OR=3.037，95% CI：1.245~7.406；P=0.015）和闭塞远端反流位置位于海绵窦段以上（C4~C6段；OR=3.118，95% CI：1.206~8.061，P=0.019）是慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通失败的危险因素。进一步分析血管再通失败原因，27例（81.82%）术中微导丝无法通过闭塞段，主要发生于C4~C5段（14例，42.42%）和C1段（11例，33.33%）；余6例（18.18%）术中发生动脉夹层，主要发生于C4~C5段（5例，15.15%）。结论慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通治疗相对安全、可行，闭塞近端残端形态和远端反流位置是预测血管再通成败的关键因素。

关键词: 动脉闭塞性疾病, 颈内动脉, 血管成形术, 危险因素, Logistic模型

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the causes and possible influence factors of endovascular recanalization failure of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO). Methods One hundred and three patients with CICAO underwent endovascular recanalization in Department of Interventional Neurology in Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University were selected from December 2012 to December 2019. The factors possibly related to failure (including sex, age, underlying disease, time from occlusion to recanalization, the shape of the stump and the position of the reflux) were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to screen for influence factors related to the failure of recanalization. Results In 103 cases, there were 33 patients who failed in recanalization, the failure rate was 32.04%. One case (0.97%) occurred subarachnoid hemorrhage which induced severe headache during operation. Logistic regression analysis showed that the stump of the occluded ICA was non-pointed (OR=3.037, 95% CI:1.245-7.406; P=0.015) and the reflux position of the distal ICA was above the cavernous sinus (C4-C6 segment; OR=3.118, 95% CI:1.206-8.061, P=0.019) were the risk factors for failure of successful rate after endovascular recanalization of CICAO. Of the 33 failure cases, 27 cases (81.82%) were due to guide wires failed to pass through the occlusion segment, which mainly occurred in C4-C5 segment (14 cases, 42.42%) and C1 segment (11 cases, 33.33%); other 6 cases (18.18%) were due to dissection which mainly occurred in C4-C5 segment (5 cases, 15.15%). Conclusions Endovascular recanalization of CICAO is relatively safe and feasible. The stump condition and the position of distal reflux of the occluded ICA are the key in judging the difficulty of recanalization.

Key words: Arterial occlusive diseases, Carotid artery,internal, Angioplasty, Risk factors, Logistic models

何子骏, 莫大鹏, 邓一鸣, 霍晓川, 马宁, 高峰, 缪中荣. 慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通失败原因分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(6): 489-495.

HE Zi-jun, MO Da-peng, DENG Yi-ming, HUO Xiao-chuan, MA Ning, GAO Feng, MIAO Zhong-rong. Analysis of failure in endovascular recanalization of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2020, 20(6): 489-495.

http://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/CN/Y2020/V20/I6/489

参考文献

[1] Flaherty ML, Flemming KD, McClelland R, Jorgensen NW, Brown Jr RD. Population-based study of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion:incidence and long-term follow-up[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35:e349-352.
[2] Bryan DS, Carson J, Hall H, He Q, Qato K, Lozanski L, McCormick S, Skelly CL. Natural history of carotid artery occlusion[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2013, 27:186-193.
[3] Professional Committee of Neurointerventional Therapy, Interventional Physician Branch, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Interventional Radiology Group, Radiology Branch, Chinese Medical Association; Combined Interventional Neurosurgery Branch, Chinese Stroke Association; Ischemic Stroke Interventional Therapy Professional Committee, National Stroke Prevention and Control Engineering Committee. Chinese expert consensus on recanalization of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. Zhonghua Jie Ru Fang She Xue Dian Zi Za Zhi, 2019, 7:1-6.[中国医师协会介入医师分会神经介入专业委员会, 中华医学会放射学分会介入放射学组, 中国卒中学会复合介入神经外科分会, 国家脑卒中防治工程委员会缺血性卒中介入治疗专业委员会. 慢性颈内动脉闭塞再通治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 7:1-6.]
[4] Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P, Tomsick TA, von Kummer R, Saver JL, Marks MP, Prabhakaran S, Kallmes DF, Fitzsimmons BFM, Mocco J, Wardlaw JM, Barnwell SL, Jovin TG, Linfante I, Siddiqui AH, Alexander MJ, Hirsch JA, Wintermark M, Albers G, Woo HH, Heck DV, Lev M, Aviv R, Hacke W, Warach S, Broderick J, Derdeyn CP, Furlan A, Nogueira RG, Yavagal DR, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Bendszus M, Liebeskind DS; Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading (CARG) Collaborators; STIR Revascularization Working Group; STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke:a consensus statement[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44:2650-2663.
[5] Hasan D, Zanaty M, Starke RM, Atallah E, Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Singla A, Guerrero WR, Nakagawa D, Samaniego EA, Mbabuike N, Tawk RG, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Novakovic RL, White J, Schirmer CM, Brott TG, Shallwani H, Hopkins LN. Feasibility, safety, and changes in systolic blood pressure associated with endovascular revascularization of symptomatic and chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery using a newly suggested radiographic classification of chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery:pilot study[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 1:1-10.
[6] Gibo H, Lenkey C, Rhoton, AL. Microsurgical anatomy of the supraclinoid portion of the internal carotid artery[J]. J Neurosurg, 1981, 55:560-574.
[7] Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher MF, Furie KL, Heck DV, Johnston SCC, Kasner SE, Kittner SJ, Mitchell PH, Rich MW, Richardson D, Schwamm LH, Wilson JA, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack:a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2011, 45:2160-2236.
[8] Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Liapis CD. Internal carotid artery occlusion:association with atherosclerotic disease in other arterial beds and vascular risk factors[J]. Angiology, 2007, 58:329-335.
[9] Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Outcome in patients with symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery or intracranial arterial lesions:a Meta-analysis of the role of baseline characteristics and type of antithrombotic treatment[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2001, 12:228-234.
[10] Chen G. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic internal carotid artery occulasion:expert's view point and standard recommendation[J]. Zhongguo Xue Ye Liu Bian Xue Za Zhi, 2019, 29:1-3.[陈罡. 慢性颈内动脉闭塞的诊断和治疗:专家观点与规范推荐[J]. 中国血液流变学杂志, 2019, 29:1-3.]
[11] Thompson JE, Austin DJ, Patman RD. Carotid endanerectomy for cerebrovascular insufficiency:long term results in 592 patients followed up to thirteen years[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1986, 66:233-253.
[12] Debakey NE, Crawford ES, Cooley DA, Morris Jr GC, Garret HE, Fields WS. Cerebral arterial insufficiency:one to 11-year results following arterial reconstructive operation[J]. Ann Surg, 1965, 161:921-945.
[13] Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb Jr RL, Videen TO, Adams Jr HP, Derdeyn CP; COSS Investigators. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia:the carotid occlusion surgery study randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2011, 306:1983- 1992.
[14] Lin MS, Lin LC, Li HY, Lin CH, Chao CC, Hsu CN, Lin YH, Chen SC, Wu YW, Kao HL. Procedural safety and potential vascular complication of endovascular recanalization for chronic cervical internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2008, 1:119-125.
[15] Chen YH, Leong WS, Lin MS, Huang CC, Hung CS, Li HY, Chan KK, Yeh CF, Chiu MJ, Kao HL. Predictors for successful endovascular intervention in chronic carotid artery total occlusion[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9:1825-1832.
[16] Matic P, Ilijevski N, Radak S, Kolar J, Radak D. Recanalization of chronic carotid occlusion:case report and review of the literature[J]. Vascular, 2009, 17:281-283.
[17] Huang QH, Liu JM. Evaluation and technique of intravascular recanalization for chronic carotid artery occlusion[J]. Zhonghua Nao Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi (Dian Zi Ban), 2012, 6:52-54.[黄清海, 刘建民. 慢性颈动脉闭塞血管内再通治疗评估与技术[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2012, 6:52-54.]
[18] Zhao ZQ, Wei XL, Chen Z. Treatment of chronic carotid artery occlusion[J]. Zhonghua Xue Guan Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2017, 2:74-77.[赵志青, 魏小龙, 陈政. 慢性颈动脉闭塞的治疗[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2017, 2:74-77.]
[19] Park S, Park ES, Kwak JH, Lee DG, Suh DC, Kwon SU, Lee DH. Endovascular management of long-segmental petrocavernous internal carotid artery (carotid S) occlusion[J]. J Stroke, 2015, 17:336-343.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

2 慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通失败原因分析

Analysis of failure in endovascular recanalization of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张晨, 张延铭, 佟小光. 内镜下经鼻入路联合显微镜下开颅手术治疗复杂鼻颅沟通颅底肿瘤初探[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(7): 575-579.
[2]	冯珊珊. 基于危险因素的库欣病患者视力视野客观检查卫生经济学分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(7): 613-620.
[3]	邹婷婷, 马莉, 潘文静, 李长秀, 胡乃霞, 王擂. 重型颅脑创伤并发颅内感染危险因素分析及列线图预测模型构建[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(6): 496-502.
[4]	刘臣超, 刘慧权, 袁小勇, 王健, 陈绅, 王义义, 柳兴军. 重症结核性脑膜炎预后不良影响因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(6): 522-529.
[5]	郭中印, 彭鹏, 陈籽荣, 张晓琳, 董民海, 曾括, 万丽君, 向网, 万锋. 幕上肿瘤患儿手术后行脑室-腹腔分流术危险因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(5): 412-417.
[6]	彭小娇, 葛明, 吴迪, 蔡英杰, 陈佳树, 梁琛. 单中心儿童颅咽管瘤手术后下丘脑性肥胖危险因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(5): 418-424.
[7]	冯增伟, 丁平, 廖先文, 焦永辉, 左云龙, 韩宏彦. 烟雾病脑血管重建术后发生脑过度灌注综合征的临床分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(5): 460-466.
[8]	余彩遥, 叶兰, 冯占辉. 癫痫患者认知功能障碍相关危险因素研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(4): 287-291.
[9]	孙艳, 范茹雪, 陈慧丰, 尹洁, 张楠. 天津市部分城市社区老年人群轻度认知损害患病情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(4): 303-309.
[10]	乔雨晨, 常红, 王佳妹, 杨璇, 魏娜, 丁爱聪. 认知功能障碍患者激越行为特点及影响因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(4): 310-316.
[11]	甘景环, 陈志超, 刘帅, 吴昊, 纪勇. 血浆促食欲素A与路易体痴呆核心临床症状相关性分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(4): 317-325.
[12]	杨庆林, 刘朋朋, 王佳伟. 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病静脉注射甲泼尼龙后肝损伤危险因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(9): 764-769.
[13]	郭章宝, 许项前, 谌敏, 段振晖, 唐坤, 刘文华. 急性大脑中动脉M2段闭塞致缺血性卒中支架取栓术与直接抽吸取栓术对比分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(9): 810-816.
[14]	胡震, 金巍, 尹豆, 邓钰蕾, 刘军, 李彬寅. 基于DSA图像的颈内动脉相关灌注区成像临床应用初探[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 707-716.
[15]	徐娜, 易婷玉, 王则托, 吴燕敏, 林定来, 陈文伙. 急性颈内动脉狭窄性串联病变颅内动脉机械取栓后急诊颈动脉支架成形术疗效分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 729-737.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

2 慢性颈内动脉闭塞血管再通失败原因分析

Analysis of failure in endovascular recanalization of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价