基础医学与临床 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 1423-1427.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2023.09.1423

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

评价具有CD20-或CD20+特征的t(11;14)骨髓瘤患者临床疗效差异性

赵卫红1, 黄彬涛2*, 刘瑞2, 向彩霞2   

  1. 内蒙古医科大学附属医院 1.消化内科;2.血液科,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010059
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-21 修回日期:2022-12-31 出版日期:2023-09-05 发布日期:2023-09-01
  • 通讯作者: *huangbintao1979@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自然科学基金(2019MS08028),内蒙古医科大学面上项目储备基金(YKD2022MS014)

Evaluating the difference in clinical efficacy for t(11;14) multiple myeloma patients with CD20- or CD20+

ZHAO Weihong1, HUANG Bintao2*, LIU Rui2, XIANG Caixia2   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology; 2. Department of Hematology,the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University,Hohhot 010059, China
  • Received:2022-07-21 Revised:2022-12-31 Online:2023-09-05 Published:2023-09-01
  • Contact: *huangbintao1979@sina.com

摘要: 目的 评价未经自体干细胞移植的具有t(11;14)/CD20-或CD20+特征的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的临床疗效差异性。方法 收集2016年至2022年1月于内蒙古医科大学附属医院就诊的95例初诊患者,并纳入开放性临床观察。入组分为:t(11;14) /CD20-或CD20+组和具有其他低危遗传学特征的对照组,3组同时接受硼替佐米为主的诱导和来那度胺为主的巩固/维持治疗。结果 t(11;14) /CD20-特征的患者对硼替佐米诱导治疗反应差,3组总缓解率分别为11.1%、84.0%和85.2%(P<0.01);来那度胺能够提高t(11;14)/CD20-患者缓解率,使其与t(11;14)/CD20+和其他低风险组治疗反应率相当(总缓解率分别为77.8%、92.0%和93.4%,P>0.05)。生存分析显示,来那度胺使t(11;14) /CD20-和CD20+以及其他低危风险组的临床生存率差异无统计学意义[4年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为75.0%、77.1%和84.2%,4年总生存率(OS)分别为75.0%、88.5%和90.4%]。含有来那度胺治疗方案所引起的相关不良事件是可耐受的,粒细胞缺乏症、周围神经病变和3/4级感染发生的患者分别为3.2%、8.4%和15.8%。结论 对具有t(11,14)/CD20-特征的MM患者,硼替佐米治疗效果不佳,但来那度胺能够进一步提高其PFS和OS,使其和他细胞遗传学低风险的患者,获得相似的远期生存。

关键词: 多发性骨髓瘤, t(11;14), 硼替佐米, 来那度胺

Abstract: Objective To examine the differences in therapy response and confirm the effective regimen for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t (11; 14)/CD20- or CD20+, for the selection of transplantation as early treatment. Methods To find the differences in therapy response and to confirm the effective regimen for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t (11; 14)/CD20- or CD20+, for the selection of transplantation as the early treatment. There were three cytogenetics groups: t(11; 14)/CD20- or CD20+ and low-risk profile including normal or cytogenetics other than t (11; 14). Eligible patients received the bortezomib-based induction and lenalidomide-based consolidation/maintenance regimen. Results Patients with t(11;14) gained adverse therapy response for bortezomib induction regimen than other low-risk arm (OR rate: 11.1% versus 84.0% versus 85.2%, P<0.01). A prospective found that although the patients with t(11;14)/CD20- showed the poor overall response for the bortezomib-based regimen, lenalidomide-based treatment schedule makes them gain a similar therapy advantage comparing with t(11;14)/ CD20+ and other low-risk group in the study The subgroup analyses of progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) by continued lenalidomide-based consolidation/maintenance treatment also showed a benefit for lenalidomide therapy compared with observation regardless of cytogenetic risk profile and response at baseline (PFS at 4 years reached 75.0% versus 77.1% versus 84.2%, OS at 4 years was 75.0% versus 88.5% versus 90.4%, respectively). Moreover, the lenalidomide regimen little induced the incidence of fatal complications and was tolerated. There were only 3.2%, 8.4% and 15.8% patients had agranulocytosis, peripheral neuropathy and infection of 3-4 grade. Conclusions Lenalidomide regimen is more effective for t (11, 14)/ CD20- risk MM and t(11;14)/CD20+ and other cytogenetically low-risk MM are consistent in PFS and OS. In addition, the initial response rate of MM patients with unsatisfactory bortezomib treatment can also be improved.

Key words: multiple myeloma, t(11;14), bortezomib, lenalidomide

中图分类号: