皮质脑电图&mu;节律及慢皮质电位术中定位运动区皮质的方法研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.11.005

中国现代神经疾病杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (11): 955-961. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.11.005

2 皮质脑电图μ节律及慢皮质电位术中定位运动区皮质的方法研究

周思捷¹, 唐庆龙², 姜涛³, 杨瑞鑫¹, 战俣飞¹, 刘永超⁴, 朱小艳¹, 白红民¹

1 510010 广州, 解放军南部战区总医院神经外科;
2 100120 北京, 解放军总医院京中医疗区综合内科;
3 510006 广州, 华南理工大学材料科学与工程学院生物医学工程系, 研究生院2015级

收稿日期:2020-11-19 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-12-02
通讯作者: 白红民,Email:baihmfmmu@163.com
基金资助:
广东省科技计划项目（项目编号：2017B020210008）；广东省科技计划项目（项目编号：2014A020215005）

Analysis of μ rhythm and slow cortical potential of electrocorticography for intraoperative mapping of motor cortex

ZHOU Si-jie¹, TANG Qing-long², JIANG Tao³, YANG Rui-xin¹, ZHAN Yu-fei¹, LIU Yong-chao⁴, ZHU Xiao-yan¹, BAI Hong-min¹

1 Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of Chinese PLA, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong, China;
2 Department of Comprehensive Internal Medicine, Central Medical District of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100120, China;
3 Biomedical Engineering, 4 Grade 2015, School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China

Received:2020-11-19 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-02
Supported by:
This study was supported by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2017B020210008, 2014A020215005).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨采用皮质脑电图术中定位运动区皮质的可行性及临床意义。方法选择2017年6月至2019年6月进行唤醒手术且病变位于运动区的患者共8例，于全身麻醉术中唤醒状态下手术，术中采用皮质直接电刺激定位运动区皮质（金标准），采集静息态和握拳任务下皮质脑电图μ节律和慢皮质电位信号，小波分析上述不同节律运动前后的事件相关去同步化（ERD）特征量的变化，对比μ节律和慢皮质电位单独或联合应用时各阈值及不同模式识别运动区的能力，计算其定位灵敏度、特异度及受试者工作特征曲线下面积。结果（1）当μ节律ERD特征量阈值为40%、慢皮质电位ERD为1.6时，二者定位运动区皮质的灵敏度分别为81.08%（30/37）和83.78%（31/37）、特异度83.33%（25/30）和80%（24/30）。（2）μ节律联合慢皮质电位定位运动区皮质采用D模式（敏感性优先模式即μ节律或慢皮质电位呈阳性反应的区域定义为运动区皮质）时，其定位准确度最高，灵敏度和特异度分别为97.29%（36/37）和80%（24/30）。结论运动前后皮质脑电图分析对定位运动区皮质具有较高的准确性，且对脑组织无不良刺激性，有望成为术中辅助直接电刺激定位的新方法。

关键词: 脑皮层电图, 电刺激, 运动皮质, 脑图

Abstract:

Objective To explore the feasibility and effect of electrocorticography (ECoG) for intraoperative mapping of motor cortex. Methods Eight patients with brain lesions near motor areas were operated under awake craniotomy from June 2017 to June 2019. The motor-related cortices were detected by intraoperative direct electrical stimulation (DES). The ECoG signals including μ rhythm and slow cortical potential (SCP) were collected intraoperatively and analyzed by wavelet analysis from patients at rest and hand-moving state (grasp and extension motion). The changes of event-related desynchronization (ERD) of different rhythms were analyzed by wavelet analysis before and after hand grasping. The threshold values of μ rhythm, SCP and different pattern recognition in combination were compared by using DES as "gold standard". The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) and the sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Results When the threshold of ERD of the μ rhythm was chosen as 40%, the sensitivity and specificity of ECoG mapping of motor cortex were 81.08% (30/37) and 83.33% (25/30). The ERD threshold of the SCP was chosen as 1.6, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.78% (31/37) and 80% (24/30) respectively. Combined μ rhythm with SCP mapping revealed high sensitivity (97.29%, 36/37) and moderate specificity (80%, 24/30) as compared with DES when D mode (sensitive priority mode) was chosen, that was either μ rhythm or SCP positive was defined as the motor cortex. Conclusions The ECoG analysis has a higher sensitivity to locate the motor cortex without stimulating the brain. It is expected as a new adjuvant to DES for intraoperative mapping of eloquent cortex.

Key words: Electrocorticography, Electric stimulation, Motor cortex, Brain mapping

周思捷, 唐庆龙, 姜涛, 杨瑞鑫, 战俣飞, 刘永超, 朱小艳, 白红民. 皮质脑电图μ节律及慢皮质电位术中定位运动区皮质的方法研究[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(11): 955-961.

ZHOU Si-jie, TANG Qing-long, JIANG Tao, YANG Rui-xin, ZHAN Yu-fei, LIU Yong-chao, ZHU Xiao-yan, BAI Hong-min. Analysis of μ rhythm and slow cortical potential of electrocorticography for intraoperative mapping of motor cortex[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2020, 20(11): 955-961.

https://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/CN/Y2020/V20/I11/955

参考文献

[1] Gogos AJ, Young JS, Morshed RA, Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Awake glioma surgery:technical evolution and nuances[J]. J Neurooncol, 2020, 147:515-524.
[2] Gerritsen JK, Arends L, Klimek M, Dirven CM, Vincent AJ. Impact of intraoperative stimulation mapping on high-grade glioma surgery outcome:a meta-analysis[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2019, 161:99-107.
[3] Zhou SJ, Wang GL, Jiang T, Wang WM, Liu YC, Wu XM, Bai HM. Study ofμrhythm from electrocorticography in intraoperative mapping of motor cortices[J]. Zhongguo Wei Qin Xi Shen Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2018, 23:201-203.[周思捷, 王国良, 姜涛, 王伟民, 刘永超, 吴效明, 白红民. 皮质脑电图μ节律术中定位运动区皮质的研究[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2018, 23:201-203.]
[4] Zhou SJ, Jiang T, Wang WM, Wang GL, Xia LH, Liu YC, Wu XM, Zhu XY, Bai HM. The ERP of slow cortial potential resting-state networks from ECoG in intraoperative mapping of motor related cortices[J]. Zhonghua Shen Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2019, 35:59-62.[周思捷, 姜涛, 王伟民, 王国良, 夏丽慧, 刘永超, 吴效明, 朱小艳, 白红民. 皮质脑电图静息态慢皮质电位术中定位运动区皮质的方法研究[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2019, 35:59-62.]
[5] Jiang T, Bai HM, Wu XM, Wang WM. A exploration study of mapping human motor cortex by ECoG-based wavelet analysis[J]. Zhongguo Wei Qin Xi Shen Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2010, 15:134-136.[姜涛, 白红民, 吴效明, 王伟民. 皮质脑电图小波分析定位运动区的探索性研究[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2010, 15:134-136.]
[6] Fu QL, Jiang T, Huang YS. Motor cortex functional mapping using electrocorticography[J]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, 2015, 32:881-886.[符琼琳, 姜涛, 黄岳山. 基于皮质脑电的大脑皮层运动功能区定位[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2015, 32:881-886.]
[7] Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization:basic principles[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 1999, 110:1842-1857.
[8] Bouton CE, Shaikhouni A, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA, Nielson DM, Sharma G, Sederberg PB, Glenn BC, Mysiw WJ, Morgan AG, Deogaonkar M, Rezai AR. Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia[J]. Nature, 2016, 533:247-250.
[9] McCrimmon CM, Wang PT, Heydari P, Nguyen A, Shaw SJ, Gong H, Chui LA, Liu CY, Nenadic Z, Do AH. Electrocorticographic encoding of human gait in the leg primary motor cortex[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2018, 28:2752-2762.
[10] Kuo CH, Blakely TM, Wander JD, Sarma D, Wu J, Casimo K, Weaver KE, Ojemann JG. Context-dependent relationship in high-resolution micro-ECoG studies during finger movements[J].J Neurosurg, 2019, 26:1-9.
[11] Neshige S, Matsuhashi M, Kobayashi K, Sakurai T, Shimotake A, Hitomi T, Kikuchi T, Yoshida K, Kunieda T, Matsumoto R, Takahashi R, Miyamoto S, Maruyama H, Matsumoto M, Ikeda A.Multi-component intrinsic brain activities as a safe alternative to cortical stimulation for sensori-motor mapping in neurosurgery[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2018, 129:2038-2048.
[12] Wu Z, Xie T, Yao L, Zhang D, Sheng X, Farina D, Chen L, Mao Y, Zhu X. Electrocorticographic temporal alteration mapping:a clinical technique for mapping the motor cortex with movement-related cortical potentials[J]. Front Neurosci, 2017, 11:326.
[13] Nakai Y, Jeong JW, Brown EC, Rothermel R, Kojima K, Kambara T, Shah A, Mittal S, Sood S, Asano E. Three-and four-dimensional mapping of speech and language in patients with epilepsy[J]. Brain, 2017, 140:1351-1370.
[14] Boussen S, Velly L, Benar C, Metellus P, Bruder N, Trébuchon A. In vivo tumour mapping using electrocorticography alterations during awake brain surgery:apilot study[J]. Brain Topogr, 2016, 29:766-782.
[15] Arya R, Wilson JA, Fujiwara H, Rozhkov L, Leach JL, Byars AW, Greiner HM, Vannest J, Buroker J, Milsap G, Ervin B, Minai A, Horn PS, Holland KD, Mangano FT, Crone NE, Rose DF. Presurgical language localization with visual naming associated ECoG high-gamma modulation in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 2017, 58:663-673.
[16] Wang PT, King CE, McCrimmon CM, Lin JJ, Sazgar M, Hsu FP, Shaw SJ, Millet DE, Chui LA, Liu CY, Do AH, Nenadic Z.Comparison of decoding resolution of standard and high-density electrocorticogram electrodes[J]. J Neural Eng, 2016, 13:ID026016.
[17] Moses DA, Leonard MK, Makin JG, Chang EF. Real-time decoding of question-and-answer speech dialogue using human cortical activity[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10:3096.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

2 皮质脑电图μ节律及慢皮质电位术中定位运动区皮质的方法研究

Analysis of μ rhythm and slow cortical potential of electrocorticography for intraoperative mapping of motor cortex

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张大华, 宋为群, 程亦男, 袁英, 汪洁, 马佳妮. 不同电流密度经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中患者上肢运动障碍疗效分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2024, 24(3): 188-192.
[2]	田亚云, 李刚, 王铭维, 余启军, 曹凯, 马芹颖. 脉冲电磁场治疗原发性失眠临床疗效分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(8): 709-715.
[3]	张琼, 冯莉. 大脑皮质下结构与癫痫[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(3): 156-160.
[4]	陈海涓, 邓钰蕾. 经颅直流电刺激治疗难治性癫痫研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(2): 110-114.
[5]	倪兵, 朱宏伟, 杜涛, 任志伟, 舒伟, 胡永生. 单纯马尾神经损伤后慢性神经病理性疼痛手术治疗分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(10): 892-897.
[6]	袁兴, 田茂强, 余小华, 杨昌键, 窦庆阳, 束晓梅. 神经刺激术治疗儿童难治性癫研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2021, 21(8): 696-700.
[7]	聂晓奇, 郭宇宏, 程刚, 贾禄. 神经肌肉电刺激术预防自发性脑出血患者下肢深静脉血栓临床研究[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(8): 710-714.
[8]	徐秦岚, 强峻, 刘献增. 语言功能区定位技术及其在神经外科中的应用[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(11): 944-948.
[9]	陶晓蓉, 王明然, 王荣, 李志保, 樊星, 张力伟, 乔慧. 术中直接电刺激运动诱发电位对脑干运动功能保护作用初探[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(11): 949-954.
[10]	宗轶烜, 沈琦, 肖明, 方媛, 毛庆. 全身麻醉下运动诱发电位对邻近运动功能区胶质瘤手术后运动障碍的预测价值[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(11): 962-969.
[11]	张玉忠, 陈籽辰, 王继红, 魏馨雨, 徐勇, 陈飞云, 吴彩芹, 成颖, 许珉, 张青. 直流电刺激诱发的前庭诱发肌源性电位[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2018, 18(9): 638-642.
[12]	徐舒, 李泓钰, 杜晓霞, 宋鲁平. 经颅直流电刺激治疗脑卒中后失语研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2018, 18(6): 461-466.
[13]	付蓓蓓, 姜文新, 秦碧勇, 李颖波. 神经传导阻滞联合脊髓电刺激术治疗带状疱疹后神经痛疗效分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2018, 18(12): 897-901.
[14]	曾繁勇, 张志强, 杨昉, 胡建平, 许强, 卢光明. 急性缺血性卒中患者运动皮质激活及功能重组的功能磁共振成像研究[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2017, 17(12): 883-890.
[15]	刘强强, 徐纪文, 周洪语, 叶晓来, 赵晨杰, 马军峰. 迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫疗效分析和参数调试体会[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2015, 15(9): 722-727.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

2 皮质脑电图μ节律及慢皮质电位术中定位运动区皮质的方法研究

Analysis of μ rhythm and slow cortical potential of electrocorticography for intraoperative mapping of motor cortex

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价