基础医学与临床 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 1392-1395.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2025.10.1392

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于“基因工程”课程探讨“理实融通”助力本科生科研思维进阶

高新景1#, 王娇2#, 刘宇嘉2, 冯畅2, 郭亚楠2, 郭晓琳3*   

  1. 1.高等教育出版社 生命科学与医学出版事业部,北京 100120;
    上海大学 2.生命科学学院 分子神经生物学教研室; 3.教务部 教师教学发展中心,上海 201900
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-18 修回日期:2025-07-17 出版日期:2025-10-05 发布日期:2025-09-22
  • 通讯作者: *gxlecnu@163.com
  • 作者简介:#对本文有相同贡献
  • 基金资助:
    中国陶行知研究会职业教育专业委员会2025年度“十四五”规划“职业教育”专项课题(ztz2025006);高等教育出版社研究课题(2022HEP023);2025年度上海市教育科学研究项目(C2025268);上海市关键技术研发计划(25J22800700)

“Integrating theory and practice” facilitates the advancement of undergraduate students' scientific research thinking:based on the “genetic engineering” course

GAO Xinjing1#, WANG Jiao2#, LIU Yujia2, FENG Chang2, GUO Yanan2, GUO Xiaolin3*   

  1. 1. Life Sciences and Medicine Publishing Department, Higher Education Press, Beijing 100120;
    2. Teaching and Research Section of Molecular Neurobiology, School of Life Sciences;
    3. Teacher Teaching Development Center,Academic Affairs Office, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201900, China
  • Received:2025-04-18 Revised:2025-07-17 Online:2025-10-05 Published:2025-09-22
  • Contact: *gxlecnu@163.com

摘要: 当前生物学专业人才培养过程中存在教学内容滞后科研动态、教学模式违背知识传授规律、教学评价缺乏科研创新维度的问题。为解决上述问题,“基因工程”教学团队在理论分析和教学实践经验总结提炼的基础上,基于“理实融通”理念进行教学模式改革探索,构建了“知识讲授-思维演练-实践操作-反馈评价”科研性教学模式。该教学模式以批判性、一致性、简洁性、逻辑性和完整性五个科研思维核心要素为准则,围绕知识讲授、思维演练、实践操作和反馈评价四步骤展开实施。经过实施,发现通过知识体系的重构性讲授、科研场景的沉浸式模拟、技术痛点的真实性攻关、教学难点的多元性反馈,该教学模式能够有效地引导师生重视科研思维,并显著地提高了学生的科研思维能力,同时也改善了教学效果。

关键词: 理实融通, 科研性教学模式, 教学改革, 科研思维

Abstract: In the current process of talent cultivation in biology majors, some challenges like teaching content that lags behind the forefront of scientific research, instructional models that deviate from the principles of effective knowledge transmission, and evaluation systems that lack dimensions reflecting scientific innovation. As a strategy of tackling challenges, the Genetic Engineering teaching team, drawing on theoretical analysis and extensive teaching practice, has explored a reform of the instructional model from the perspective of integrating theory with practice. This effort led to the development of a research-oriented teaching model characterized by four iterative stages: knowledge instruction, thinking exercises, practical operation, and feedback evaluation. This model is grounded in five core elements of scientific thinking: criticality, coherence, simplicity, logic, and integrity. Implementation follows the four-step framework, emphasizing structured knowledge delivery, cultivation of analytical thinking, hands-on experimentation, and comprehensive feedback. After one semester of application, it was found that through reconstructed knowledge systems, immersive simulations of research contexts, realistic problem-solving of technical bottlenecks and all-round feedback, this teaching model effectively fosters scientific thinking among both instructors and students, significantly enhances students' scientific research capabilities and improves overall teaching effectiveness.

Key words: integrating theory and practice, scientific research-oriented teaching model, teaching reform, scientific research thinking ability

中图分类号: