基础医学与临床 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 578-581.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

内分泌临床专科医师集中培训课程设置及效果评价

袁涛1, 李琦2, 张化冰1, 茅江峰1, 赵峻2, 朱惠娟1*   

  1. 1.中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 内分泌科 卫健委内分泌重点实验室, 北京 100730;
    2.中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 教育处, 北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-08 修回日期:2020-01-07 出版日期:2020-04-05 发布日期:2020-04-06
  • 通讯作者: *shengxin2004@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院2016年度校级研究生教育教学改革项目(10023201600110)

Evaluation of curriculum setting and outcome of intensive training for clinical endocrinologists

YUAN Tao1, LI Qi2, ZHANG Hua-bing1, MAO Jiang-feng1, ZHAO Jun2, ZHU Hui-juan1*   

  1. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of the National Healthy Commission;
    2. Department of Education, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2019-10-08 Revised:2020-01-07 Online:2020-04-05 Published:2020-04-06
  • Contact: *shengxin2004@163.com

摘要: 目的 为满足内分泌代谢专科医师提高诊治水平的需求,组织短期集中培训并评价培训效果。方法 设立了内分泌专科医师短期集中培训课程,并以微信投票方式设计课程评估表。统计分析受训者对课程的满意度。结果 内分泌专科医师短期集中培训课程按内分泌疾病系统划分,共包括6类,35个课程:甲状腺疾病(4个),代谢性骨病(4个),糖、脂、尿酸代谢疾病(8个),下丘脑-垂体疾病(9个),肾上腺疾病(5个),临床思维培训(5个)。全部课程在6 d内完成。结果以分类和评分两种方式呈现,分类结果包括非常满意、一般、不满意,分别统计投票人数的百分比。评分采用5分制,直接计算出全体评分学员的平均分。参加培训者总体对课程满意度高(平均分>4.5分),评价结果为“非常满意”者比例78.2%~100%,“一般”者比例为0~21.8%。对常见病课程授课质量要求更高(受训者不满意比例1.19%~2.30%),对疑难病、罕见病课程满意度更高(7个课程平均分5分)。结论 内分泌临床专科医师培训课程设置应以满足临床工作需求为目标,建立分层培训体系,授课形式应多样化,采用量化的课程评估方法。

关键词: 内分泌学, 规范化培训, 教学

Abstract: Objective In order to meet the needs of endocrinology and metabolism specialists and so to improve the level of diagnosis and treatment, short-term intensive training was organized and its outcome was evaluated. Methods A short-term intensive training course for endocrinologists was implemented and the course evaluation form was designed by vote of WeChat.The learning results were statistically analyzed. Results The short-term intensive training course for endocrinologists were divided into 6 categories and covered by courses, including thyroid diseases (4), metabolic bone diseases (4), glucose, lipid and uric acid metabolic diseases (8), hypothalamic-pituitary diseases (9), adrenal diseases (5), and clinical reasoning training courses (5). All courses were completed in 6 days. The results were presented in both categories and ratings. The results of the category included “very satisfied”, “average” and “unsatisfied”, and the percentage of the number of voters was counted respectively. The five-points system was adopted for ratings, and the average score of all voters was calculated. Participants generally had high satisfaction with the course (average score: >4.5), and the evaluation results were 78.2%~100% in “very satisfied” and 0~21.8% in “average” category. Higher requirements for the teaching quality of common diseases (dissatisfaction rate of the trainees: 1.19%~2.30%), higher satisfaction for difficult and rare diseases (average score of 7 courses: 5). Conclusions The curriculum of endocrinologist clinical training should be developed to meet the needs of clinical work. It is necessary to develop a stratified training syste, divrsified teaching forms and quantitative course evaluation methods.

Key words: endocrinology, standardized training, teaching

中图分类号: