基础医学与临床 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 1318-1321.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2022.08.1318

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学生第二课堂参与骨关节标本制作的探索

申新华, 刘伟, 李文婷, 曹承刚, 马超*   

  1. 中国医学科学院基础医学研究所 北京协和医学院基础学院 人体解剖与组织胚胎学系, 北京 100005
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-07 修回日期:2022-05-26 出版日期:2022-08-05 发布日期:2022-08-01
  • 通讯作者: *machao@ibms.pumc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院2021年教学质量工程项目(2021zlgc0710)

Medical students participate in bone and joint specimen preparation in the second classroom

SHEN Xin-hua, LIU Wei, LI Wen-ting, CAO Cheng-gang, MA Chao*   

  1. Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences CAMS, School of Basic Medicine PUMC, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2022-04-07 Revised:2022-05-26 Online:2022-08-05 Published:2022-08-01
  • Contact: *machao@ibms.pumc.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 评估医学生参与骨关节标本制作对解剖学考试成绩的影响及学生对解剖学第二课堂的反馈。方法 将2021级4+4临床医学试点班学生分为实验组和对照组。实验组利用课余时间在教师指导下进行四肢骨关节标本制作,对照组仅观察实习标本;对两组学生解剖学成绩进行统计分析,并发放问卷调查学生对骨关节标本制作的反馈。结果 期末标本考试成绩实验组与对照组相比差异无统计学意义;但实验组学生的最低正确率(40%)高于对照组学生的最低正确率(32.5%),实验组学生的最高正确率(95%)高于对照组学生的最高正确率(82.5%)。单独统计骨关节标本正确率,实验组(87.0%±16.7%)显著高于对照组(66.7%±24.3%)(P<0.01)。在四肢理论测验中,实验组平均成绩(84.7%±20.5%)显著高于对照组(69.3%±14.5%)(P<0.05)。学生对第二课堂开展骨关节标本制作整体评价较好。结论 医学生第二课堂参与骨关节标本制作能够提高学习成绩,是第一课堂的有益补充,值得进一步完善与推广。

关键词: 人体解剖学, 第二课堂, 关节, 标本制作

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of participation in bone and joint specimen preparation on anatomy exam scores and medical students' feedback to the second anatomy classroom. Methods The students of “4+4” program of clinical medicine enrolled in 2021 were divided into experiment and control groups. The students in experiment group were asked to prepare joint specimens under the guidance of teachers in after class time, while the students in control group only required to observe the specimens. The anatomy exam scores of the two groups were analyzed and and questionnaire survey was implemented to collect students' feedback about the joint specimen preparation. Results There was no significant difference in the scores of final examiniation between the experiment group and the control group. However, the lowest and the highest correct rates in experimenl group (40% and 95% respectively) were both higher than that of the control group (32.5% and 82.5% respectively). If the correct rate of joint specimens was calculated separately, the experiment group (87.0%±16.7%) was significantly higher than that of control group (66.7%±24.3%) (P<0.01). In the limb theory test, the mean score of the experiment group (84.7%±20.5%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (69.3%±14.5%) (P<0.05). The students gave a high evaluation to the joint specimen preparation in after class time or called second classroom. Conclusions Medical students' participation in joint specimen preparation as the second classroom can improve their learning outcomes and this second classroom strategy as a supplement to the first classroom may be potentiallt shared by other medical schools.

Key words: human anatomy, second classroom, joint, specimen preparation

中图分类号: