基础医学与临床 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 1643-1647.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2025.12.1643

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

腔内激光闭合术与高位结扎剥脱术治疗大隐静脉曲张的疗效比较

吴小冬*   

  1. 扬州大学附属泰州第二人民医院 血管外科,江苏 泰州 225500
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-05 修回日期:2025-10-14 出版日期:2025-12-05 发布日期:2025-11-25
  • 通讯作者: *wxd662763@163.com

Efficacy comparison between endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities

WU Xiaodong*   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Taizhou Second People′s Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Taizhou 225500, China
  • Received:2025-09-05 Revised:2025-10-14 Online:2025-12-05 Published:2025-11-25
  • Contact: *wxd662763@163.com

摘要: 目的 比较腔内激光闭合术和高位结扎剥脱术治疗大隐静脉曲张的疗效。方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究的方法分析2022年01月—2024年12月泰州市第二人民医院行大隐静脉曲张治疗的416例患者的临床数据,根据手术方式不同分为两组,其中217例患者接受腔内激光闭合术治疗(观察组),199例患者接受高位结扎剥脱术治疗(对照组)。比较两组患者的基线资料(包括年龄、性别、BMI、患侧、CEAP分级),手术时间,术中出血量,住院时间,治疗总费用,术后并发症发生率,临床疗效、术后2年复发率的差异。结果 观察组和对照组基线资料无统计学差异。在围手术期关键治疗指标对比中,观察组手术时长、术中出血量、术后住院周期均显著少于对照组(P<0.05),但治疗总费用显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。在术后并发症发生率方面,观察组的发生率为9.40%,显著低于对照组的20.20%(P<0.05)。观察组的治疗总有效率为98.29%,对照组的治疗总有效率为96.97%,无统计学意义的差异;术后复发率方面,观察组与对照组分别为8.55%和8.08%,两组复发率无明显差异。结论 相较于高位结扎剥脱术,腔内激光闭合术手术耗时更短、术中出血量更少、术后住院周期更短、并发症发生率更低、患者恢复更快。

关键词: 大隐静脉曲张, 腔内激光闭合术, 高位结扎剥脱术, 隐神经损伤, 加速康复外科

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) and high ligation and stripping (HLS) in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Methods A retrospective case-control study was used to analyze the clinical data of 416 patients who received treatment for great saphenous varicose veins in Taizhou Second People's Hospital from January 2022 to December 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 217 patients underwent EVLT (observation group) and 199 underwent HLS (control group). Baseline data (age, sex, BMI, affected side, CEAP classification), operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, total treatment cost, postoperative complications, clinical efficacy, and 2-year recurrence rates were compared. Results There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the observation group and the control group.In the comparison of key perioperative treatment indicators, the operation duration,intra-operative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group(P<0.05),while the total treatment cost of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).In terms of postoperative complication incidence, the observation group had a significant lower rate (9.40%) as compared with the control group (20.20%)(P<0.05). Regarding the total effective rate of treatment, the observation group achieved 98.29%, while the control group reached 96.97%. There was no significant statistical difference in the total effective rate between the two groups. As for the postoperative recurrence rate, the observation group had a rate of 8.55% and the control group 8.08%, with no significant difference. Conclusions Both EVLA and HLAS exhibit remarkable therapeutic effects in treating GSVV, with minimal saphenous nerve injury and low 2-year postoperative recurrence rate. Nevertheless, EVLA has more advantages during and after surgery in terms of less time for surgical operation, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative complications and faster recovery.

Key words: great saphenous vein varicosities, endovenous laser therapy, high ligation and stripping, saphenous nerve injury, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

中图分类号: