[1] Wong DT, Ooi A, Singh KP, et al. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGainTM and the LMA® SupremeTM supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2018, 65:797-805. [2] Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, et al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2013, 30:119-123. [3] Wong DT, Ooi A, Singh KP, et al. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGainTM and the LMA® SupremeTM supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2018, 6:797-805. [4] Liew GH, Yu ED, Shah SS, et al. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery[J]. Singapore Med J, 2016,57:432-437. [5] Lopez AM, Agusti M, Gambus P, et al. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2017,31:1255-1262. [6] Yoo JY, Kwak HJ, Ha EJ, et al. Comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope-assisted insertion versus standard blind technique for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults[J]. Singapore Med J, 2022, 63:342-344. [7] Cattano D, Ferrario L, Maddukuri V, et al. A randomized clinical comparison of the intersurgical i-gel and LMA Unique in non-obese adults during general surgery[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2011, 77:292-297. [8] Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2009,102:264-268. [9] Tan Y, Jiang J, Wang R. Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gelTM and LMA ProSealTM in patients: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17:e0278871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278871. [10] Yan CL, Chen Y, Sun P, et al. Preliminary evaluation of SaCoVLMTM video laryngeal mask airway in airway management for general anesthesia[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2022, 22:3. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01541-0. [11] Sun Y, Zhang M, Gao X, et al. Effect of the new video laryngeal mask airway SaCoVLM on airway management in lateral laparoscopic urological surgery: a single center randomized controlled trial[J]. Sci Rep, 2024,14:2132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51856-4. [12] Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, et al. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial[J]. Anesthesiology, 2010,112:652-657. [13] Van Zundert AA, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TC. Malpositioning of supraglottic airway devices: preventive and corrective strategies[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016,116:579-582. [14] Kumar CM, Van Zundert TC, Seet E, et al. Time to consider supraglottic airway device oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement more objectively[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2021,65:142-145. [15] Gong YH, Yi J, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of low dose rocuronium in preventing ventilation leak for flexible laryngeal mask airway during radical mastectomy[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8:13616-13621. [16] Saraswat V. Effects of anaesthesia techniques and drugs on pulmonary function[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2015,59:557-564. [17] Fujiwara A, Komasawa N, Nishihara I, et al. Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal® in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. J Anesth, 2015,29:580-584. [18] Natalini G, Facchetti P, Dicembrini MA, et al. Pressure controlled versus volume controlled ventilation with laryngeal mask airway[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2001, 13: 436–439. [19] Fiedler MO, Schätzle E, Contzen M, et al. Evaluation of different positive end-expiratory pressures using SupremeTM airway laryngeal mask during minor surgical procedures in Children[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2020,56:551. doi: 10.3390/medicina56100551. [20] Rustagi P, Patkar GA, Ourasang AK, et al. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressures of Proseal LMA in laparoscopic urological procedures[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017,11:UC05-UC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22168.9422. [21] KumarA, Sinha C, Kumar N, et al. Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between three second generation supraglottic airway devices during laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2022,32:843-850. doi: 10.1111/pan.14447. [22] Lan S, Zhou Y, Li JT, et al. Influence of lateral position and pneumoperitoneum on oropharyngeal leak pressure with two types of laryngeal mask airways[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2017, 61:1114-1121. [23] Mishra SK, Sivaraman B, Balachander H, et al. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gelTM and ProSeal LMATM in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized control-led trial[J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2015,9:353-358. [24] Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV, et al. Influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the I-gel: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2015, 2015:705869. doi: 10.1155/2015/705869. [25] Ravi R, Mohan VK, Badhe AS, et al. Comparison of weight-based and pinna size-based selection of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in paediatric population-a prospec-tive exploratory trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2019, 63:36-41. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_423_18. [26] In CB, Cho SA, Lee SJ, et al. Comparison of the clinical performance of airway management with the i-gel® and laryngeal mask airway SupremeTM in geriatric patients: a prospective and randomized study[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2019, 72:39-46. [27] Katsiampoura AD, Killoran PV, Corso RM, et al. Laryngeal mask placement in a teaching institution: analysis of difficult placements[J]. F1000Res, 2015, 4:102. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6415.1. [28] Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, et al. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed Laryngeal Mask Airway UniqueTM: a study of 15,795 patients[J]. Anesthesiology, 2012,116:1217-1226. |