脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中神经电生理监测:预警标准敏感性和特异性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2020.11.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的分析脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中神经电生理监测预警标准的敏感性和特异性。方法选择2012年11月至2016年3月神经外科手术治疗的脊髓海绵状血管畸形患者共64例，术中采用运动诱发电位（MEP）联合体感诱发电位（SEP）对神经功能进行监测，并以运动诱发电位波幅降低≥ 80%作为预警标准预测术后神经功能缺损情况，以McCormick分级作为“金标准”，计算其灵敏度和特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果运动诱发电位波幅降低≥ 80%联合体感诱发电位多模态监测的灵敏度为75%（15/20）、特异度78.57%（33/42），阳性预测值为62.50%（15/24）、阴性预测值86.84%（33/38）。结论脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中运动诱发电位联合体感诱发电位监测可有效预测术后新发神经功能缺损，运动诱发电位预警标准以波幅降低≥ 80%为宜。

关键词: 血管畸形, 脊髓, 术中神经电生理监测, 诱发电位

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of neuroelectrophysiological monitoring and warning criterion in the spinal cord cavernous malformations surgery. Methods A total of 64 patients with spinal cord cavernous malformation underwent surgical treatment were collected from November 2012 to March 2016. All patients underwent intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP). Multimodal monitoring combined MEP amplitude decreased ≥ 80% with SEP was performed to predict the postoperative neurological function defect of patients. McCormick grade as "gold standard" was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 75% (15/20), 78.57% (33/42), 62.50% (15/24) and 86.84% (33/38), respectively. Conclusions Intraoperative MEP combined with SEP monitoring can effectively predict the occurrence of new neurological deficits after operation. MEP amplitude reduction ≥ 80% can be used as the operation warning criterion.

Key words: Vascular malformations, spinal cord, Intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring, Evoked potentials

李晓宇, 张鸿祺, 凌锋, 胡鹏, 任健. 脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中神经电生理监测:预警标准敏感性和特异性分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2020, 20(11): 970-974.

LI Xiao-yu, ZHANG Hong-qi, LING Feng, HU Peng, REN Jian. Intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring of spinal cavernous vascular malformations: sensitivity and specificity of monitoring and warning criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2020, 20(11): 970-974.

http://journal11.magtechjournal.com/cjcnn/CN/Y2020/V20/I11/970

参考文献

[1] Clark AJ, Wang DD, Lawton MT. Spinal cavernous malformations[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2017, 143:303-308.
[2] Goyal A, Rinaldo L, Alkhataybeh R, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Flemming KD, Williams L, Diehn F, Bydon M. Clinical presentation, natural history and outcomes of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2019, 90:695-703.
[3] Nuwer MR, Schrader LM. Spinal cord monitoring[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2019, 160:329-344.
[4] Tobert DG, Glotzbecker MP, Hresko MT, Karlin LI, Proctor MR, Emans JB, Miller PE, Hedequist DJ. Efficacy of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for pediatric cervical spine surgery[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42:974-978.
[5] Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journée H, Slappendel R, de Kleuver M. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity:a study of 145 patients[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28:1043-1050.
[6] Park T, Park J, Park YG, Lee J. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for spinal cord tumor surgery:comparison of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials according to tumor types[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2017, 41:610-620.
[7] Ren J, Hong T, Zeng G, He C, Li X, Ma Y, Yu J, Ling F, Zhang H. Characteristics and long-term outcome of 20 children with intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations[J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 86:817-824.
[8] Ren J, He C, Hong T, Li X, Ma Y, Yu J, Ling F, Zhang H. Anterior to dorsal root entry zone myelotomy (ADREZotomy):a new surgical approach for the treatment of ventrolateral deep intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43:E1024-1032.
[9] Ghadirpour R, Nasi D, Iaccarino C, Giraldi D, Sabadini R, Motti L, Sala F, Servadei F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intradural extramedullary tumors:why not[J]? Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 130:140-149.
[10] Kharkar S, Shuck J, Conway J, Rigamonti D. The natural history of conservatively managed symptomatic intramedullary spinal cord cavernomas[J]. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60:865-872.
[11] Ren J, Hong T, He C, Li X, Ma Y, Yu J, Ling F, Zhang H. Surgical approaches and long-term outcomes of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations:a single-center consecutive series of 219 patients[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2019, 31:123-132.
[12] MacDonald DB. Overview on criteria for MEP monitoring[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2017, 34:4-11.
[13] Wang S, Li C, Guo L, Hu H, Jiao Y, Shen J, Tian Y, Zhang J. Survivals of the intraoperative motor-evoked potentials response in pediatric patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery:what are the neurologic outcomes of surgery[J]? Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019, 44:E950-956.
[14] Hattori K, Yoshitani K, Kato S, Kawaguchi M, Kawamata M, Kakinohana M, Yamada Y, Yamakage M, Nishiwaki K, Izumi S, Yoshikawa Y, Mori Y, Hasegawa K, Onishi Y. Association between motor-evoked potentials and spinal cord damage diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging after thoracoabdominal and descending aortic aneurysm repair[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2019, 33:1835-1842.
[15] Lakomkin N, Mistry AM, Zuckerman SL, Ladner T, Kothari P, Lee NJ, Stannard B, Vasquez RA, Cheng JS. Utility of intraoperative monitoring in the resection of spinal cord tumors:an analysis by tumor location and anatomical region[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43:287-294.
[16] Li X, Zhang HQ, Ling F, He C, Ren J. Differences in the electrophysiological monitoring results of spinal cord arteriovenous and intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 122:e315-324.
[17] Li X, Zhang HQ, Ling F, He C, Hu P, Hu T, Yu J. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during the surgery of spinal arteriovenous malformation:sensitivity, specificity, and warning criteria[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 165:29-37.
[18] Tamkus AA, Rice KS, McCaffrey MT. Perils of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring:analysis of "false-negative" results in spine surgeries[J]. Spine J, 2018, 18:276-284.
[19] Kurokawa R, Kim P, Itoki K, Yamamoto S, Shingo T, Kawamoto T, Kawamoto S. False-positive and false-negative results of motor evoked potential monitoring during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2018, 14:279-287.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

2 脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中神经电生理监测:预警标准敏感性和特异性分析

Intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring of spinal cavernous vascular malformations: sensitivity and specificity of monitoring and warning criteria

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	罗凯, 朱晟, 卢科, 吴声田, 姚洁民, 符黄德. 长程皮下通道脑室外引流术在神经外科的可行性分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(6): 509-514.
[2]	徐琛, 张毅, 王敏, 赵瑞, 施伟, 李昊. 不同年龄段儿童终丝脂肪浸润/脂肪瘤型脊髓拴系综合征临床特征与手术疗效分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(5): 398-404.
[3]	魏民, 蒋文彬, 詹琪佳, 李森, 刘晨, 肖波. 选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗痉挛型脑瘫患儿疗效与影响因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(5): 405-411.
[4]	王娜, 翁诗雯, 邵晓秋, 李志梅, 王群, 吕瑞娟. 神经梅毒合并猫立克次体感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(4): 368-374.
[5]	邱伟, 罗文静. 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病神经再生研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(9): 747-751.
[6]	张婧, 李亚桐, 王佳伟. 晚发型与极晚发型视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病临床特点分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(9): 757-763.
[7]	杨庆林, 刘朋朋, 王佳伟. 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病静脉注射甲泼尼龙后肝损伤危险因素分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(9): 764-769.
[8]	孙亚婷, 邵若晨, 李晓晖, 任士卿. 伴抗胶质纤维酸性蛋白抗体阳性的复发性短节段脊髓炎一例[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(9): 783-786.
[9]	菅凤增, 王兴文. 分子病理诊断时代脊柱脊髓肿瘤的诊断与治疗[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 651-654.
[10]	曹宁, 封亚平, 谢佳芯. 《脊髓损伤神经修复治疗临床指南（中国版）2021》解读[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 655-661.
[11]	姚庆宇, 马龙冰, 菅凤增. 脊髓空洞症大鼠模型长期稳定性评价[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 662-668.
[12]	吴菁, 舒良, 陈伟, 孙旭红, 刘建仁. 感觉障碍平面低于病变平面的压迫性颈髓病变三例[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 702-706.
[13]	万雅兰, 蒋岩岩, 周红, 郑艺明, 吕鹤, 赵桂萍, 陈静, 孙葳, 王朝霞. 表现为帕金森综合征的脊髓小脑性共济失调2型两家系并文献复习[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(8): 723-728.
[14]	孙庆利, 马妍, 樊东升. 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病合并其他自身免疫性疾病临床特点分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(4): 300-305.
[15]	孙志芳, 李星楼, 孙维震, 罗美玲, 王永慧. 基于功能性近红外光谱成像技术的脊髓损伤患者脑激活及脑网络改变研究[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2022, 22(11): 956-964.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

2 脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中神经电生理监测:预警标准敏感性和特异性分析

Intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring of spinal cavernous vascular malformations: sensitivity and specificity of monitoring and warning criteria

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价