基础医学与临床 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 570-573.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

重症医学科进修医生临床规范化培训模式与考核体系初探

何怀武, 袁思依, 周翔, 周元凯, 汤铂, 苏龙翔, 刘大为, 隆云*   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 重症医学科,北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-14 修回日期:2019-07-08 出版日期:2020-04-05 发布日期:2020-04-06
  • 通讯作者: *ly_icu@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院2018年校级本科教育教学改革项目(2018zlgc0105)

Standardized training mode and evaluation system in critical care medicine for the training intensivtists

HE Huai-wu, YUAN Si-yi, ZHOU Xiang, ZHOU Yuan-kai, TANG Bo, SU Long-xiang, Liu Da-wei, LONG Yun*   

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100730,China
  • Received:2019-02-14 Revised:2019-07-08 Online:2020-04-05 Published:2020-04-06
  • Contact: *ly_icu@aliyun.com

摘要: 目的 探讨关于重症医学进修医生规范化培训模式和考核体系。方法 于2015年至2017年,针对在北京协和医院重症医学科的进修医生,实施“基础培训、感控培训、重症思维和重症科研”等系列模块规范化培训,并建立以3个月为周期的“理论考核+操作考核+主观考核”的综合临床能力考核体系。结果 来自全国共161名进修医生在学习期间参加规范化培训,初始理论摸底考试通过率为34%, 经过3个月基础培训,理论考核通过率显著提高到75.5% (P<0.05)。无菌考核第一次通过率为25%,经过强化培训考核通过可显著提高到95%(P<0.05)。在第1个考核周期内(第3个月)临床综合能力考核的通过率为44%,在第2个考核周期内(第6个月)临床综合能力考核的通过率为91%。结论 重症医学科进修医生的基础重症理论知识、感控观念和重症思维相对薄弱,经过规范化培训后均可得到提高。“理论考核+操作考核+主观评价”综合评估体系有助于评价和提高进修医生的重症临床能力。

关键词: 重症医学, 规范化培训, 考核体系, 重症进修医生

Abstract: Objective To explore the standardized training model and assessment system for training intensivtists. Methods The training doctors in ICU of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 2015—2017, the implementation of “basic training, infection control, critical thinking and critical care medicine research” module training,and set up to 3 months for a cycle of “theory + operation + subjective assessment” of comprehensive clinical ability assessment system. Results A total of 161 training doctors from all over the country participated in the intensive clinical standardized training. The initial pass rate of the theoretical examination was 34%: after 3 months' of basic training, the passing rate of theoretical examination was significantly increased up to 75.5% (P<0.05). The first pass rate of aseptic training: 25%, through the enhanced training a significant increase to 95% (P<0.05). In the first assessment cycle (the first 3 months), the passing rate of clinical competence assessment was 44%, and the passing rate of clinical competence assessment was 91% in second assessment cycles (sixth months). Conclusions The critical knowledge, sense of control and critical thinking are relatively weak in intensive care medicine training doctors, and they can be strengthened after clinical standardized training. The comprehensive evaluation system of “theoretical assessment + operation assessment + subjective evaluation” is helpful to evaluate the critical clinical ability of the training intensivtists.

Key words: critical care medicine, standardized training, evaluation system, training intensivtist

中图分类号: