Abstract: Objective To evaluate the outcomes of continuing education program by a survey among 73 participa-ting physicians before and after the course training with 73 and 65 valid responses before and after the workshop collected respectively. Methods The questionnaire covered physicians' basic information, their understanding of precision treatment, feedback on the course content and suggestions about the workshop. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software, primarily employing descriptive statistics and χ² tests. Results The overall satisfaction rate among participants was 90.77%, with the lung cancer session (90.77%) and practical case analysis(86.15%) being the most popular. The course significantly improved physicians' understanding of proteomics analysis (P＜0.05) and the importance of adjusting treatment plan in precision treatment of tumors(P＜0.05). Additionally, 81.54% of physicians agreed that precision treatment of tumors significantly enhanced patients' quality of life (P＜0.05). Physicians also showed increased attention to multidisciplinary team (MDT) and patient mental health. Suggestions for future courses included optimizing resource provision and increasing interactive sessions. Conclusions This continuing education program has achieved remarkable results in enhancing physicians' knowledge and capacity building of precision treatment for cancer. The evaluation of the course suggests that future education should further focus on the actual needs of physicians and to optimize the content design to support the application of precision treatment in clinical practice.

Key words: precision treatment, continuing medical education, teaching effectiveness, clinical practice