基础医学与临床 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 1532-1535.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2025.11.1532

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

PDCA循环与TBL嵌入式教学法在妇科肿瘤学临床教学中的应用

谭树芬1*, 王茜2, 张磊1, 张一1, 李树清2   

  1. 1.昆明医科大学第三附属医院/云南省肿瘤医院/北京大学肿瘤医院云南医院 妇科,云南 昆明 650118;
    2.昆明医科大学 基础医学院,云南 昆明 650050
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-23 修回日期:2025-09-15 出版日期:2025-11-05 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: *shufen591@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    昆明医科大学教育教改基金(2023-JY-Y-145); 云南省肿瘤医院[2023]年教学联盟本科教育教学研究(JXYJ20230217)

Application of PDCA cycle and TBL embedded teaching method in clinical training program of gynecologic oncology

TAN Shufen1*, WANG Qian2, ZHANG Lei1, ZHANG Yi1, LI Shuqing2   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology,the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital/ Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan,Kunming 650118;
    2. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650050,China
  • Received:2025-06-23 Revised:2025-09-15 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-10-24
  • Contact: *shufen591@hotmail.com

摘要: 目的 探索适合于妇科肿瘤学临床教学和人才培养的创新策略。方法 将昆明医科大学2020级和2021级临床医学五年制本科生各90人随机分为对照组(40人)和研究组(50人)。研究组采用计划-执行-检查-纠正(plan-do-check-action,PDCA)循环与团队学习(TBL)式教学嵌入式“4+3”教学模式,对照组采用传统教学法进行授课;两组学生通过定量考核和匿名问卷调查进行评价。结果 多维度问卷调查显示,研究组的教学模式比传统教学法能带来更好的学习体验,其中教学改革(58%)、学习兴趣(64%)、促进能力培养(72%)、提高实践技能(66%)和教学满意度(70%)显著高于传统教学法(P<0.05),且PDCA 循环可弥补上一轮教学存在的不足。笔试方面,研究组课堂测验、平时成绩和综合成绩分别为(18.38±5.81)分、(29.09±0.29)分和(82.38±4.03)分,均高于对照组(P< 0.01)。结论 PDCA循环与TBL嵌入式教学模式可促进妇科肿瘤学教学程序的规范化而提高教学质量,实现学生满意度与考核成绩的精准对标。

关键词: 妇科肿瘤学, 计划-执行-检查-纠正(PDCA)循环, 团队学习, 教学策略

Abstract: Objective To explore a new training strategy suitable for clinical education and talent cultivation in gynecologic oncology. Methods Ninety undergraduates from each of the two grades of clinical medicine curriculum at Kunming Medical University were randomly divided into control group (n=40) and research group (n=50).The“4+3”teaching model of plan-do-check-action(PDCA) cycle integrated with TBL were adopted, whereas the control group was educated with classic methods. Two groups of students were evaluated with quantitative assessments and anonymous questionnaire surveys. Results Multidimensional questionnaire surveys indicated that the teaching model of the test group provided a better learning experience than classic teaching methods as proved by significant improvements in educational reform (58%), learning interest (64%), skill development (72%), capacity building of learning (66%) and satisfaction with the new model of training (70%) (P<0.05,<0.01). Furthermore, the PDCA cycle can address the short-comings of the previous teaching iteration. In written exams, the classroom quiz scores, regular grades, and comprehensive scores of the research group were (18.38±5.81), (29.09±0.29), and (82.38±4.03) points respectively all higher than those of the control group (P<0.01). Conclusions The PDCA cycle and the TBL-embedded teaching model promote the standardization of gynecologic oncology teaching procedures, thereby enhancing teaching quality and achieving precise alignment between student satisfaction and assessment performance.

Key words: gynecologic oncology, plan-do-check-action (PDCA) cycle, team-based learning, teaching strategy

中图分类号: