基础医学与临床 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 1522-1527.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2025.11.1522

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

“肿瘤的精准治疗”继续教育学习班教学效果分析

李宁宁1#, 严毅飞2#, 王颖轶1*, 王利娜3   

  1. 1.中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 肿瘤内科,北京 100730;
    2.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 研究生院,北京 100730;
    3.北京朝阳中西医结合急诊抢救医院 肿瘤三区,北京 100020
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-18 修回日期:2025-03-18 出版日期:2025-11-05 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: *wangyingyidaifu@163.com
  • 作者简介:#对本文有相同贡献
  • 基金资助:
    2022年北京高等教育“本科教学改革创新项目”(202210023002);2022年度校级本科教育教学改革项目(2022zlgc0102)

Analysis of teaching effectiveness in a course of ‘Precision Treatment of Tumors’as continuing education program

LI Ningning1#, YAN Yifei2#, WANG Yingyi1*, WANG Lina3   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100730;
    2. Graduate School, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100730;
    3. Oncology Ward 3, Beijing Chaoyang Integrative Medicine Rescue and First Aid Hospital,Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2025-02-18 Revised:2025-03-18 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-10-24
  • Contact: *wangyingyidaifu@163.com

摘要: 目的 评估北京协和医院举办的“肿瘤的精准治疗”继续教育学习班的教学效果,为未来肿瘤学继续教育的开展提供改进建议。方法 采用问卷调查法,对73名参会医师进行学习班前和学习班后调查,回收有效问卷分别为73份和65份。问卷内容包括医师的基本情况、对肿瘤精准治疗的认知、学习内容反馈及建议。数据分析采用SPSS 22.0软件,主要使用描述性统计和χ2检验。结果 参会医师对学习班的整体满意度为90.77%,其中肺癌专场(90.77%)和实战案例分析(86.15%)最受欢迎。学习班显著提升了医师对蛋白质组学分析(P<0.05)和调整治疗方案在肿瘤精准治疗中重要性(P<0.05)的认知。81.54%的医师认为精准治疗显著提升了患者生活质量(P<0.05)。医师对多学科协作(MDT)和患者心理健康的重视也有所增加。未来学习班改进建议包括优化资料供给和增加互动环节。结论 本次继续教育在提升医师对肿瘤精准治疗的认识和应用能力方面取得了显著成效,并提示未来的教育应进一步聚焦医师的实际需求,优化内容设计,以更好地推动精准治疗在临床实践中的应用。

关键词: 精准治疗, 继续医学教育, 教学效果, 临床实践

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the outcomes of continuing education program by a survey among 73 participa-ting physicians before and after the course training with 73 and 65 valid responses before and after the workshop collected respectively. Methods The questionnaire covered physicians' basic information, their understanding of precision treatment, feedback on the course content and suggestions about the workshop. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software, primarily employing descriptive statistics and χ2 tests. Results The overall satisfaction rate among participants was 90.77%, with the lung cancer session (90.77%) and practical case analysis(86.15%) being the most popular. The course significantly improved physicians' understanding of proteomics analysis (P<0.05) and the importance of adjusting treatment plan in precision treatment of tumors(P<0.05). Additionally, 81.54% of physicians agreed that precision treatment of tumors significantly enhanced patients' quality of life (P<0.05). Physicians also showed increased attention to multidisciplinary team (MDT) and patient mental health. Suggestions for future courses included optimizing resource provision and increasing interactive sessions. Conclusions This continuing education program has achieved remarkable results in enhancing physicians' knowledge and capacity building of precision treatment for cancer. The evaluation of the course suggests that future education should further focus on the actual needs of physicians and to optimize the content design to support the application of precision treatment in clinical practice.

Key words: precision treatment, continuing medical education, teaching effectiveness, clinical practice

中图分类号: