基础医学与临床 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 695-699.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年髋关节骨折手术不同麻醉方式的预后比较

阮侠1,徐仲煌2,唐帅3,张秀华2   

  1. 1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院
    2. 北京协和医院麻醉科
    3. 北京协和医院
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-24 修回日期:2015-03-16 出版日期:2015-05-05 发布日期:2015-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 张秀华 E-mail:xiuzhangpumch@aliyun.com

Comparative analysis of three different anesthetic techniques for hip fracture surgery in patients aged over 65 years

  • Received:2014-11-24 Revised:2015-03-16 Online:2015-05-05 Published:2015-04-28

摘要: 目的 总结近5年北京协和医院老年髋关节骨折患者的围术期资料,比较不同麻醉方式患者的预后及治疗费用。方法 回顾2009年7月至2014年6月收治的65岁以上单侧髋关节骨折患者,排除多发伤或先后行两次以上手术者,平均年龄78.8±7.2岁。根据麻醉方式分为全身麻醉(121例)、椎管内麻醉(215例)和外周神经阻滞(147例)3组。重点关注患者的术前一般情况、合并症及手术完成情况,比较术中血流动力学、术后ICU停留时间、总住院时间、死亡率、并发症及治疗费用。结果 与全身麻醉和椎管内麻醉组比较,外周神经阻滞组患者平均年龄较大,ASA III级患者比例较多,更多患者术前合并冠心病、COPD、肺部感染和呼吸衰竭(P < 0.05);与其他两组相比,神经阻滞组患者术中的血流动力学更加平稳(P < 0.05);在预后方面,与全身麻醉组相比,椎管内麻醉和外周神经阻滞组患者术后ICU停留时间更短(P < 0.05),总住院费用更低(P < 0.01)。结论 对于高龄、ASA分级较高、合并心肺疾病的单侧髋关节骨折患者手术时更倾向选择外周神经阻滞技术,此种麻醉方法可使患者术中的血流动力学更加稳定,缩短术后ICU停留时间,减少治疗费用。

关键词: 老年, 髋关节骨折, 围术期预后, 外周神经阻滞

Abstract: Objective To retrospectively analyze the perioperative data of patients aged over 65 years undergoing surgery for hip fracture in Peking Union Medical College Hospital in the past 5 years. Methods: The patients aged over 65 years undergoing surgery for unilateral hip fracture between July 2009 and June 2014 were included in this study, with an average age of 78.8±7.2 years. According to different anesthetic techniques, all cases were divided into three groups: general anesthesia (121 cases), intervertebral anesthesia (215 cases), and nerve block group (127 cases). The data about preoperative complications and the course of operation were collected, the intraoperative hemodynamic changes, postoperative ICU stay, total hospital stay, mortality, morbidity and the cost of treatment were compared. Results: Compared with general and intervertebral groups, patients in nerve block group were older, more patients were in ASA III grade, more patients were complicated with coronary heart disease, COPD, lung infection or respiratory failure preoperatively (P<0.05), at the same time, the intraoperative maximum variations of blood pressure and heart rate significantly decreased in nerve block group compared with other two groups (P<0.05). Compared with the general group, patients in the regional groups (intervertebral and nerve block) had shorter postoperative ICU stay (P<0.05) and lower total costs of treatment (P<0.01). Conclusion: Peripheral nerve block is a safe and effective anesthetic technique for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, especially for those who were older, in ASA III grade and complicated with coronary heart disease or diseases in respiratory system. This technique could make the intraoperative hemodynamics stable and cut down the postoperative ICU stay and the costs of treatment.

Key words: elder patient, hip fracture, perioperative prognosis, nerve block

中图分类号: