基础医学与临床 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 1756-1760.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2024.12.1756

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    

BOPPPS结合CPBL及情景模拟在心血管内科教学中的应用

尤舒心, 周星宇, 朱之苑, 安辰鸿, 周宪梁, 罗芳*   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 国家心血管病中心 阜外医院 心内科,北京 100037
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-13 修回日期:2024-10-14 出版日期:2024-12-05 发布日期:2024-11-26
  • 通讯作者: *luofang@fuwaihospital.org
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院青年医学教育学者计划 (2022zlgc0701)

Application of the BOPPPS combined with CPBL and scenario simulation in cardiovascular internal medicine teaching

YOU Shuxin, ZHOU Xingyu, ZHU Zhiyuan, AN Chenhong, ZHOU Xianliang, LUO Fang*   

  1. Department of Cardiology, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100037, China
  • Received:2024-09-13 Revised:2024-10-14 Online:2024-12-05 Published:2024-11-26
  • Contact: *luofang@fuwaihospital.org

摘要: 目的 研究旨在探讨BOPPPS教学模型结合以病例-问题为基础的教学方法(CPBL)和情景模拟教学方法在心血管内科教学中的应用效果。方法 以本校2022级、2023级心血管内科研究生作为研究对象,其中2022级研究生(n=12)为对照组采用传统教学方法,2023级研究生(n=16)为试验组采用BOPPPS结合CPBL和情景模拟的教学模型。评估两组研究生课堂理论考核成绩,并以问卷调查的形式评估采用BOPPPS结合CPBL和情景模拟的教学模型的研究生在自我能力评价及教学满意度调查情况。结果 理论试卷考试成绩显示,试验组得分(97.94±3.46)高于对照组(69.13±12.88),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。问卷调查显示,在教学效果评价方面,超过93.75%的试验组学生非常认同或比较认同BOPPPS结合CPBL和情景模拟的教学形式能够激发学习兴趣、提高学习效率、提高自主学习能力、加深对理论知识的理解、帮助建立临床逻辑思维、提高团队协作能力;在教学总体评价方面,超过93.75%的试验组学生非常赞同或比较赞同课程教学重点突出、促进师生间互动,接受课程设计形式并愿意在未来沿用。结论 在心内科研究生教学中采用BOPPPS教学模型,结合CPBL和情景模拟教学方法,取得了良好的教学效果,能够激发学生学习兴趣、提高自主学习能力,同时学生对该模式的满意度普遍较高。

关键词: BOPPPS, CPBL, 情景模拟, 教学效果, 心血管内科

Abstract: Objective This study aims to evaluate the application of BOPPPS teaching model combined with case and problem-based learning (CPBL) and the scenario simulation in cardiovascular internal medicine education. Methods The study included cardiovascular internal medicine graduates from the 2022 and 2023 cohorts. The 2022 cohort (n=12) served as the control receiving traditional teaching methods, while the 2023 cohort (n=16) was the experimental group, which utilized the BOPPPS model combined with CPBL and scenario simulation. The students theoretical examination scores were assessed and a questionnaire survey was conducted to evaluate self-assessment of abilities and teaching satisfaction among the students in the experimental group. Results The examination scores of experimental group were significantly higher (97.94±3.46) as compared to that of control group (69.13±12.88) (P<0.05). Over 93.75% of the students in the experimental group strongly or somewhat agreed that the combined teaching model stimulated their learning interest, improved learning efficiency, facilitated their capacity building of autonomous learning, theoretical knowledge, helped establish clinical reasoning, and improved their teamwork skills. Additionally, over 93.75% of the students were highly satisfied with the course design, emphasizing key content, promoting teacher-student interaction, and expressed willingness to continue with this teaching method in the future. Conclusions The application of the BOPPPS teaching model combined with CPBL and scenario simulation in cardiovascular internal medicine education achieved excellent teaching outcomes. It effectively stimulated students interest in learning, enhanced autonomous learning abilities, and received high satisfaction ratings from students.

Key words: BOPPPS, CPBL, scenario simulation, teaching effect, cardiovascular internal medicine

中图分类号: