基础医学与临床 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 1486-1489.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2023.09.1486

• 医学管理 • 上一篇    

携带人脑基因的恒河猴实验引发的伦理问题调研结果分析

桂益欣1,2, 杜英杰3, 张新庆1,2*   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 1.人文和社会科学学院;2.马克思主义学院,北京 100730;
    3.首都医科大学北京同仁医院 麻醉科, 北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-16 修回日期:2023-05-04 出版日期:2023-09-05 发布日期:2023-09-01
  • 通讯作者: *xqzhang@pumc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(L1824002)

An empirical study on the ethical issues caused by the experiment of rhesus monkey carrying human brain gene

GUI Yixin1,2, DU Yingjie3, ZHANG Xinqing1,2*   

  1. 1. School of Humanities and Social Science; 2. School of Marxism, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100730;
    3. Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2023-01-16 Revised:2023-05-04 Online:2023-09-05 Published:2023-09-01
  • Contact: *xqzhang@pumc.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 2019年,中国医学研究团队构建了人类MCPH1的转基因恒河猴模型,有必要了解科研人员对此类新型伦理问题的认知和行为倾向。方法 课题组自行编制了调查问卷,内容包括人口统计学信息、伦理情景题等,被调查者为申请2019年国家自然科学基金的医学科研人员。对所得数据进行了描述性统计分析。结果 70.9%的被调查者(n=11 164)称使用携带人类基因的转基因猴研究存在伦理问题;最突出的伦理问题是“不可接受的风险-受益比”(49.1%)和“对恒河猴的伤害”(33.7%);31.1%的被调查者称,此研究只要得到所在机构伦理委员会的批准就可以开展。结论 医学研究人员对此类转基因猴研究持谨慎态度。转基因猴实验应更加严格执行3R原则,人-恒河猴嵌合体研究应遵循伦理规范,严格审查。

关键词: 转基因猴, 伦理问题, 风险-受益比, 伦理审查

Abstract: Objective In 2019, A Chinese medical research team constructed a transgenic rhesus monkey model of human MCPH1, which is necessary to understand the cognition and behavior tendency of researchers on this new type of ethical issues. Methods The research group developed a questionnaire containing demographic information and ethical situational questions. The respondents were medical researchers who applied for the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2019. The data obtained are analyzed by descriptive statistics. Results Overall, 70.9% of respondents (n=11 164) believed that there were ethical challenges when use the genetically modified monkeys who carrying human genes for medical research; The most prominent ethical issues were “unacceptable risk-benefit ratio” (49.1%) and “harm to rhesus monkeys” (33.7%); 31.1% of them believed that the study could be carried out when improvement from the ethics committee of their institution was availabl. Conclusions Medical researchers are cautious about such genetically modified monkeys. The 3R principle shouldbe strictly implemented in the medical research of transgenic monkeys, and the study of human-rhesus monkey chimerism should follow ethical norms and be strictly reviewed.

Key words: transgenic monkey, ethical issues, risk-benefit ratio, ethical review

中图分类号: