基础医学与临床 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 1573-1577.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2024.11.1573

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

分娩镇痛转剖宫产手术不同麻醉方式对产妇及胎儿围术期的影响

方婧涵, 冯颖辰, 韩如泉*   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院 麻醉科,北京 100070
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-02 修回日期:2024-09-12 出版日期:2024-11-05 发布日期:2024-10-31
  • 通讯作者: *hanrq666@aliyun.com

Effects of different anesthesia methods on puerperants and fetus perioperatively undergoing cesarean delivery after epidural labor analgesia

FANG Jinghan, FENG Yingchen, HAN Ruquan*   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2024-08-02 Revised:2024-09-12 Online:2024-11-05 Published:2024-10-31
  • Contact: *hanrq666@aliyun.com

摘要: 目的 回顾性分析硬膜外中转和重新蛛网膜下腔阻滞对分娩镇痛转剖宫产手术产妇和胎儿围手术期的影响。方法 选择2020年1月至2022年11月于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院行硬膜外分娩镇痛、产程中改行剖宫产手术分娩产妇共42例,收集相关临床资料,根据剖宫产麻醉方式,将产妇分为硬膜外麻醉(EA)组(硬膜外中转组)和蛛网膜下腔麻醉(SA)组(蛛网膜下腔阻滞组)。对比两种麻醉方式围手术期对产妇及胎儿的影响。结果 同EA组产妇相比,SA组产妇围手术期麻醉效果[视觉模拟评分(VAS),频数(%)]更优 [VAS评分0~3:5(25%) vs. 14(70%);VAS评分4~6:12(60%) vs. 6(30%);VAS评分7~10:3(15%) vs. 6(30%)],围手术期并发症发生率更高。两组产妇围手术期出血量、新生儿阿普加(Apgar)评分及新生儿脐动脉血气分析比较差别均无统计学意义。结论 分娩镇痛转剖宫产手术中,选择重新行蛛网膜下腔阻滞的麻醉效果优于硬膜外中转,但围手术期需要密切观察产妇并防治并发症。

关键词: 硬膜外分娩镇痛,剖宫产, 硬膜外中转(麻醉), 蛛网膜下腔阻滞(麻醉), 麻醉效果

Abstract: Objective To observe the effects of epidural anesthesia and subarachnoid anesthesia on puerperants and fetus perioperatively undergoing cesarean delivery after epidural labor analgesia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to select and analyze the relevant clinical data of women who had epidural labor analgesia and were converted to cesarean delivery at Beijing Tiantan Hospital. According to the anesthesia method of cesarean section, the participants were divided into the epidural anesthesia(EA) group and the subarachnoid anesthesia(SA) group. That were aimed to compare the effects of the two anesthesia methods on the mother and fetus perioperatively. Results Compared with women in the epidural anesthesia group, women in the subarachnoid anesthesia group had a better anesthesia outcome,visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, frequency (%)[VAS scores 0-3: 5(25%) vs. 14(70%); VAS scores 4-6: 12(60%) vs. 6(30%); and VAS scores 7-10: 3(15%) vs. 6(30%)], and higher perioperative complication rate. There was nonsignificance difference in perio- perative maternal bleeding, neonatal Apgar score, and neonatal umbilical artery blood gas analysis between the two groups. Conclusions In women with epidural analgesia undergoing cesarean section, the anesthesia effect of subarachnoid anesthesia is better than that of the epidural anesthesia. The anesthesiologist must pay attention to prevent complications in the perioperative period.

Key words: epidural labor analgesia, cesarean delivery, epidural anesthesia, subarachnoid anesthesia, anesthesia effect

中图分类号: