基础医学与临床 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1330-1334.

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

室温放置4 h对样本尿蛋白质组分析的影响

杨丽君1,郭正光2,景宗攀1,孙玉琳1,孙伟3,赵晓航1   

  1. 1. 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院
    2. 中国医学科学院
    3. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 基础医学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-16 修回日期:2019-06-28 出版日期:2019-09-05 发布日期:2019-09-06
  • 通讯作者: 孙伟 E-mail:sunwei1018@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金;中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程

Effects of a 4-hour staying at room temperature on urinary proteome analysis

  • Received:2019-05-16 Revised:2019-06-28 Online:2019-09-05 Published:2019-09-06

摘要: 目的 探讨用医院检验科尿常规检查剩余的尿液样本开展尿蛋白质组分析,以便充分利用资源。方法 同一个体尿液样本采集后分别采用立即冻存和室温下放置4 h后冻存于-80℃备用。尿液样本分别进行聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳、二维凝胶电泳和液相色谱串联质谱分析,对比两种尿液样本采集方法对尿蛋白质组分析的影响。用点杂交免疫印迹法分析了室温放置4 h尿液样本(n=150)中胞质非特异性二肽酶(CNDP2)蛋白在结直肠癌患者与健康对照尿液中的含量。结果 立即冻存和经室温放置4 h后冻存的尿液样本的主要蛋白条带、数量和位置无明显差异;从中分别鉴定了(1204 ±50)个和(1155 ±7)个尿蛋白质,以及(7501±661)条和(6940 ±182)条多肽,两组样本间无差异。尿蛋白CNDP2在结直肠癌患者尿液中含量显著高于健康对照(P<0.001)。结论 采集后立即冻存和室温放置4 h后冻存尿液样本的尿蛋白质组分析差异无统计学意义。医院检验科尿常规检查剩余的尿液样本可用于尿蛋白质组分析。CNDP2在结直肠癌患者尿液中含量升高,是结直肠癌候选的尿蛋白标志物。

关键词: 尿蛋白质组, 二维凝胶电泳, 液相色谱串联质谱, 尿蛋白生物标志物

Abstract: Objective Using the remainder urine samples of hospital laboratories for urinary proteomic analysis to save resource for urine sample collection. Methods Urine samples collected from the same individuals were divided into two parts. In which, half of them was frozen in -80℃ immediately and the rest was stayed in room temperature for 4 h (4h-RT) before frozen in -80℃. Samples were then analyzed by proteomics strategy including sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and liquid chromatography tanden mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The differentially expressed urinary proteins were then compared between the two sample collection methods. Using the urine samples (n=150) collected by 4 h-RT, the expression levels of cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase 2 (CNDP2) between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and health controls were analyzed by Dot blot assay. Results There was no significant difference in the main protein bands, numbers and positions of SDS-PAGE and 2DE analysis between the frozen immediately and 4 h-RT samples. A total of (1204 ± 50) kinds and (1155 ± 7) kinds of urine proteins, and (7501 ± 661) and (6940 ± 182) peptides were identified with no significant difference between the two groups. The level of CNDP2 was significantly higher in the urine of CRC patients than that in healthy controls (P < 0.001). Conclusions There was no significant difference in urinary proteome between the samples frozen immediately or 4 h-RT staying after collection. The urine samples after laboratory examinations in hospital can be used for urinary proteomics analysis. The expression level of CNDP2 is elevated in the urine of CRC patients and it may be a candidate marker of CRC.

Key words: urine proteome, 2-DE, LC-MS/MS, urinary biomarker

中图分类号: