基础医学与临床 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 138-141.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

生理学试卷传统和情景式选择题的比较

李烁,郭玲,庞炜,李肖霞,陈曼,宋德懋,祝世功   

  1. 北京大学医学部
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-22 修回日期:2016-05-09 出版日期:2017-01-05 发布日期:2016-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 祝世功 E-mail:zsgong@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本科护理学专业课程建设

Comparison of the traditional and situational choice questions in the physiological examination

  • Received:2015-12-22 Revised:2016-05-09 Online:2017-01-05 Published:2016-12-30
  • Supported by:
    Course construction of undergraduate nursing major

摘要: 目的 评估情景式考题对生理学试卷质量和考察学生能力的作用。方法 以难度系数和区分度为指标,比较试卷情景式和传统选择题的考核效果。结果:情景式考题难度系数比传统考题有所增加,且情景式考题的区分度更合理。情景式理解型考题的区分度高于传统的记忆型和理解型考题,情景式应用型考题区分度与相应的传统考题相比没有差别。结论 情景式考试题不仅能提高试卷质量,更能考察和评估学生的学习能力。

关键词: 关键词:生理学 , 试卷分析, 区分度, 难度系数, 情景式选择题

Abstract: Objective Evaluating the effect of situational questions for qualifying the students’ abilities in physiology examination. Methods Comparing the difficulty coefficients and discrimination indexes between situational and traditional choice questions. Results Compared with the traditional choice questions, the difficulty coefficient of situational questions increased, while the discrimination indexes were more reasonable. The discrimination indexes of situational understanding questions were higher than those of the traditional memory and understanding questions. There were no difference between discrimination indexes of the situational application questions and those of traditional application questions. Conclusion Situational questions not only improved the quality of examinations, but also did better in evaluating students' learning ability.

Key words: Key words: physiology,, Test paper analysis, discrimination, difficulty coefficient,, situational choice questions

中图分类号: