基础医学与临床 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1154-1157.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

以框架为基础的三种教学方式的比较

杨银1,张宇成2   

  1. 1. 北京协和医学院基础学院
    2. 北京协和医学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-03 修回日期:2014-06-13 出版日期:2014-08-05 发布日期:2014-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨银 E-mail:yyboby0706@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    FBL教学及自学模式的实践与初步评估

Frame-work based learning : Comparison of learning results underlying three different teaching methods

  • Received:2014-06-03 Revised:2014-06-13 Online:2014-08-05 Published:2014-07-15
  • Contact: YANG Yin E-mail:yyboby0706@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Practice and preliminary exploration of frame-work based learning

摘要: 目的 探测以框架为基础的教学模式下三种不同教学方法的效果。方法 在教学改革中,医学微生物教学和医学英语教学整合,采取多元化的全英文教学模式,其中包括以框架为基础的教学/自学模式。北京协和医学院73名学生参与该教学/自学模式的实践,在此模式下,通过客观测试评估和比较三种不同学习方式(教师讲解、同伴教育和学生自学)的效果。结果 学生对所学知识的即时掌握程度和40d后掌握程度得分从高至低依次为教师讲解(3.79±0.89 和 3.35±1.18)、学生自学(2.71±1.03 和2.86±0.88)和同伴教育(2.42±1.08 和 2.10±1.13)(P﹤0.01);不同学习方式下学生的即时掌握程度与40d后掌握程度得分的差值各不相同,教师讲解部分和同伴教育部分得分明显降低,学生自学部分反而增高(P﹤0.05)。 结论 在以框架为基础的教学模式下,三种不同的教学方式各有其优缺点,这提示学生自学和教师讲解在教学中都应当有适当的比例。

关键词: 关键词:以框架为基础的学习, 教师讲解, 同伴教育, 自学, 评估

Abstract: Objective In the study we mainly aimed to compare the results of three methods of teaching/learning which are based on frame-work based learning model. Methods In the reform of medical education, the teaching of Medical Microbiology was partly integrated with Medical English and frame-work based learning model was involved. In the study, 73 students in Peking Union Medical College were enrolled in the practice of this reform of frame-work based learning and experience three methods of teaching/learning: instructor regulated learning, peer regulated learning and self regulated learning. Objective tests were taken to investigate the master degree of related knowledge both at the immediate time (post test) and after 40 days (delayed retention test). Results The score of master degree of related knowledge ranking list are similar in the post test and delayed retention test: instructor regulated learning(3.79±0.89 and 3.35±1.18, self regulated learning(2.71±1.03 and 2.86±0.88)and peer regulated learning(2.42±1.08 and 2.10±1.13)(P﹤0.01).While the disparity between the two exams of the same student varies in three methods of teaching/learning, the scores in instructor regulated learning and peer regulated learning mode dropped significantly but exhibit a minor promotion in score in the self regulated learning mode(P﹤0.05). Conclusion The results indicate different advantages and disadvantages of the three modes of learning, showing that appropriate proportion of these three teaching/learning methods is needed to be detected and adjusted to get the best results.

Key words: Key words: Frame-work based learning, instructor regulated learning, peer regulated learning, self-regulated learning, evaluation

中图分类号: