[1]Harpole M, Davis J, Espina V. Current state of the art for enhancing urine biomarker discovery [J]. Expert Rev Proteomics, 2016, 13: 609-626. [2]Shao C, Zhao M, Chen X, et al. Comprehensive analysis of individual variation in the urinary proteome revealed significant gender differences [J]. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2019, 18: 1110-1122. [3]Potriquet J, Laohaviroj M, Bethony JM, et al. A modified FASP protocol for high-throughput preparation of protein samples for mass spectrometry [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 11:175-185. [4]Streleckiene G, Reid HM, Arnold N, et al. Quantifying cell free DNA in urine: comparison between commercial kits, impact of gender and inter-individual variation [J]. Biotechniques, 2018, 64: 225-230. [5]Liu X, Shao C, Wei L, et al. An individual urinary proteome analysis in normal human beings to define the minimal sample number to represent the normal urinary proteome [J]. Proteome Sci, 2012, 10:70-82. [6]Thongboonkerd V,McLeish KR,Arthur JM, et al. Proteomic analysis of normal human urinary proteins isolated by acetone precipitation or ultracentrifugation [J]. Kidney Int, 2002, 62: 1461-1469. [7]Crowell AM, Wall MJ, Doucette AA. Maximizing recovery of water-soluble proteins through acetone precipitation [J]. Anal Chim Acta, 2013, 796: 48-54. [8]王秋霞,王建华,曹力,等. 儿童原发性肾病综合征尿蛋白质组样品预处理方法的研究 [J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2011, 13: 157-160. [9]Wisniewski JR. Filter-aided sample preparation: the versatile and efficient method for proteomic analysis [J]. Methods Enzymol, 2017, 585: 15-27. [10]Nagaraj N, Mann M. Quantitative analysis of the intra- and inter-individual variability of the normal urinary proteome [J]. J Proteome Res, 2011, 10: 637-645. [11]Guo Z, Zhang Y, Zou L, et al. A proteomic analysis of individual and gender variations in normal human urine and cerebrospinal fluid using iTRAQ quantification [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10:133-155. [12]Higgs RE, Butler JP, Han B, et al. Quantitative proteomics via high resolution MS quantification: capabilities and limitations [J]. Int J Proteomics, 2013, 19:282-292. [13]Mertins P, Udeshi ND, Clauser KR, et al. iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics [J]. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2012, 11:6-17. [14]Leng W, Ni X, Sun C, et al. Proof-of-concept workflow for establishing reference intervals of human urine proteome for monitoring physiological and pathological changes [J]. EBioMedicine, 2017, 18: 300-310. |