基础医学与临床 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 293-297.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用混合模拟技术对急诊医师危重症抢救能力的评价

柴晶晶1,刘继海2,朱华栋3,于学忠3,杜铁宽1,温伟4,陈燕启4   

  1. 1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院
    2. 协和医院急诊科
    3. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院急诊科
    4. 卫生部北京医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-06 修回日期:2018-10-31 出版日期:2019-02-05 发布日期:2019-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘继海 E-mail:liujihai1977@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院教学改革项目

Evaluation of rescue capability in critical illness of emergency doctors by using mixed simulation technology

  • Received:2018-08-06 Revised:2018-10-31 Online:2019-02-05 Published:2019-01-16
  • Contact: Liu Jihai E-mail:liujihai1977@aliyun.com

摘要: 目的 以混合模拟技术为基础,探讨急诊医师的危重症抢救能力的现况,评估以胜任力为基础的抢救能力考核的有效性及可行性。方法 应用高仿真模拟技术模拟实际临床危重症场景,评估急诊医师危重症临床思维及团队合作沟通能力,比较不同性别、学历、职称、培养年限和工作年限之间的差异。结果 参与考核急诊医师共38名,总分为(74.38±11.26)分。主治医师组和住院医师组分别是:(78.66±6.82)分和(70.96±12.07)分,主治医师危重症抢救能力得分显著高于住院医师。住院医师规范化培训第2-3年组和进修医师组,分别是(71.21±12.28)分和(79.63±7.75)分,进修医师明显高于住院医师规范化培训第2-3年住院医师。工作年限1-3年组、4-10年组和≥10年组,分别为(70.00±12.14)分、(82.90±6.89)分和(76.04±6.45)分,工作4-10年医师组明显高于1-3年医师组(P<0.05)。结论 应用混合模拟技术评价急诊住院医师和进修医师的危重症抢救能力,具有较好的有效性及可行性。

关键词: 危重症, 模拟技术, 团队配合

Abstract: Objective To discuss the current situation of rescue capability in critical illness of emergency doctors based on the mixed high-fidelity simulation technology and to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the competency-based rescue capability assessment. Methods The mixed high-fidelity simulation technology was used to simulate the actual clinical critical illness scenarios, and then compare the differences of score between different genders, educational background, professional titles, training years, and work experience. Results A total of 38 emergency doctors participated in the examination. The total score was (74.38±11.26). The score of attending physicians group and the residents group were: (78.66±6.82) and (70.96±12.07) respectively. The score of attending physicians was significantly higher than that of the residents. The Score of standardized training resident group and the further education physician group were (71.21±12.28) and (79.63±7.75) respectively, with that of further education physicians significantly higher than that of the residents. The score of work experience of 1-3 years group, 4-10 years group and ≥10 years group were (70.00±12.14), (82.90±6.89) and (76.04±6.45) respectively, with that of 4-10 years group was obviously higher than that of 1-3 years group. Conclusions: The application of mixed high-fidelity simulation technology to evaluate rescue capability of emergency residents and further education physicians is effective and feasible.

Key words: critical illness, simulation technology, team dynamics