摘要
目的首次对小秦艽和秦艽的核型进行比较研究,为其遗传和进化提供了进一步的细胞学证据。方法根尖用0.002mol·L-1的8-羟基喹啉溶液预处理5.7h,用2.5%混合酶液,于25℃下酶解1.6h,低渗处理3h(置于冰箱内),然后用空气干燥法制片。结果小秦艽的核型公式是K(2n)=26=2M+24m,属于"1A"型,染色体相对长度组成为2n=26=2L+10M2+12M1+2S;秦艽的核型公式是K(2n)=26=2M+20m+4sm,属于"2B"型,染色体相对长度组成为2n=26=6L+6M2+8M1+6S。结论小秦艽的核型与秦艽相比较,秦艽较为进化。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study karyotypes of Gentiana dahurica Fisch and G.macrophylla Pall for the first time.This will provide cytological evidence for further studies on genetics and evolution.METHODS The root tip was soaked in 0.002 mol·L-1 8-oxychinolin solution for 5.7 h.Then,the sample was decomposed in 2.5% mixed enzyme solution for 1.6 h at 25 ℃ and treated with Hypotonic for 3 h in refrigerator.At last,specimen slides were prepared by the air-drying technique.RESULTS The karyotypes formula of G.dahurica was K(2n)=2X=26=2M+24m,which belonged to "1A" and whose relative length of chromosomes was 2n=26=2L+10M2+12M1+2S.The karyotypes formula of G.macrophylla was K(2n)=2X=26=2M+20m+4sm,which belonged to "2B" and whose relative length of chromosomes was 2n=26=6L+6M2+8M1+6S.CONCLUSION Comparing karyotypes of G.dahurica with G.macrophylla,the result showed that G.macrophylla lives in higher stage of evolution than G.dahurica.
关键词
小秦艽 /
秦艽 /
核型
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Gentiana dahurica Fisch /
Gentiana macrophylla Pall /
karyotype
{{custom_keyword}} /
刘丽莎;王岚;孙少伯;吴迪.
小秦艽和秦艽核型的比较研究[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2009, 44(05): 331-333
LIU Li-sh;WNG Ln;SUN Sho-o;WU Di.
Comparative Studies on Karyotypes of Gentiana dahurica Fisch and G.macrophylla Pall [J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2009, 44(05): 331-333
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] SUN S M. The Shennong Herb-Root Classic（神农本草经）[M]. Beijing：People's Medical Publishing House，1975：67.
[2] Ch.P（2005）Vol Ⅰ（中国药典2005版.一部）[S]. 2005：190-191.
[3] CHEN R Y，SONG W Q，LI X L. A new method for prepa-ring mitotic chromosomes from plant [J]. J Integratire Plant Biology（植物学报），1979，21(3)：297-298.
[4] LIU L S，ZHANG X L. Comparative studies on karyotypes of Cuscuta chinensis Lam. And C. japonica Choisy [J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs（中草药），2000，31(17)：784-786.
[5] LIU L S，JI K P. Germination characters of seed of Gentiana macrophylla [J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs（中草药），2002，33(3)：269-271.
[6] LEVEN A，FREDGA K，SANBERG A A. Nomenclature for centr-omeric position on chromosomes [J]. Hereditas，1964，52：201-220.
[7] KUO S R，WANG T T，HUANG T C. Karyotype Analysis of Some Formosan Gymnosperms [J]. Taiwania，1972，17(1)：66.
[8] STEBBINS G L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants[M]. London：Edward Arnold，1971：85-104.
[9] LI M X，CH R Y. A suggestion on the standardization of karyotype analysis in plants [J]. J Wuhan Bot Res（武汉植物学研究），1985，3(4)：297-301.
[10] ARANO H. Cytological studies in Subfamily carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan，IX. The karyotype analysis and phylog-enic considerations on Pertya and Anisliaea (2) [J]. Bot Mag (Tokyo)，1963，76：32-39.
[11] The Editrial Board of Flora China，Chinese Academy of Science. Flora of China（中国植物志）[M]. Vol 62. Beijing，Science Press，1988：59-75.
[12] AI T M. Medical Botany（药用植物学）[M]. Beijing：Peking University Press，2004：129-130.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家中医药管理局项目(04-C5ZL23);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(3ZS041-A25-066)
{{custom_fund}}
