目的:研究罗红霉素胶囊在正常人体内的药动学与相对生物利用度。方法:采用反相高效液相色谱法测定10名志愿者单剂量po300 mg罗红霉素胶囊与罗力得片后的血药浓度变化情况,计算二者的药动学参数与相对生物利用度,以AUC0→∞与Cmax/AUC为指标,用配对t检验法与双单侧t检验法分析两种制剂的生物等效性。结果:二者药-时曲线可用一室模型拟合,二者的K分别是0.0884 h-1与0.0873 h-1;tmax。分别是3.13 h与2.96 h;Cmax分别是5.08μg·ml-1与5.51μg·ml-1;AUC0→∞是76.37μg·h·ml-1与79.34μg·h·ml-1。配衬t检验与双单侧t检验结果均表明:二者AUC0→∞与Cmax/AUC0→∞均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:罗红霉素胶囊与罗力得片为生物等效制剂,罗红霉素胶囊的相对生物利用度为96.26%。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of roxithromycin capsule.METHODS: The roxithromycin concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC method following a single oral dose of roxithromycin capsule and roxithromycin tablet respectively given to 10 volunteers in a open randomized cross-over test. RESULTS: The concentration-time courves of roxithromycin capsule and roxithromycin tablet were conformed to an one compartment open model with a first order absorption. The K was 0.0884 h-1 and 0. 0873 h-1,tmax 3.13 h and 2.96h, cmax5.08μg·ml-1 and 5 . 51μg ·ml-1, AUC0→∞76 . 37μg·h·ml-1 and 79.34μg· h·ml-1of roxithromycin capsule and roxithromycin tablet respectively. There was no significant difference between the two formulations in the AUC0 →∞ and cmax/AUC0→∞.CONCLUSION: The results of statistical analysis showed that the two formulations were bioequivalent. The relative bioavailability was 96.26% of roxithromycin capsule.
关键词
罗红霉素 /
药动学 /
相对生物利用度
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
roxithromycin /
pharmacokinetics
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
1 Surendra K, Puri, Howard Blassman. Roxithromycin: a pharmacokinetic review of a macrolide. J Antirnicrob C:hemo
1987, 20, ( SuppL I3):89.
2 WHO Interchangeable multi source pharmaceutical products,
consultative document, 6, December 1993.
3 Endrenyi L, Fritsch S, Yan W.cmax<\sub>/AUC is a clearer
measure than cmax<\sub> for absorption rates in investigations of bioequivalence. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Tozicol, 1991,29: 394一399.
4 黄圣凯,韩可勤.生物等效性评价的统计方法.中国药学杂志,1994,29(5):312.
5 Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided test
procedure and power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm .1987,15(6):657.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}