基础医学与临床 ›› 2007, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 449-452.

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同提取方法对交链格孢提取液蛋白含量、组分及生物活性的影响

曹乃清 张宏誉   

  1. 北京协和医院变态反应科 北京协和医院变态反应科
  • 收稿日期:2006-05-31 修回日期:2006-09-20 出版日期:2007-04-25 发布日期:2007-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 曹乃清

Compraison of different extraction methods of alternaria alternate allergens

  

  • Received:2006-05-31 Revised:2006-09-20 Online:2007-04-25 Published:2007-04-25

摘要: 目的 探索一种有效的提取方法,以提高链格孢霉提取液中蛋白质含量、组分及生物活性。 方法 对经空气曝皿获得、中科院鉴定为链格孢霉的菌株在26℃恒温下进行培养4周,对同批培养的细菌分别用不同的提取方法来提取蛋白,然后用改良的Bradford法进行蛋白质含量测定;SDS-PAGE分析它们之间蛋白质组分的差别,RAST抑制试验比较它们之间致敏原生物活性的差异。结果 研磨器研磨(a)、液氮中研磨(b)、研磨器研磨+超声破碎(c)和液氮中研磨+超声破碎(d)后的蛋白质含量,以d法得到的蛋白质组分最多。所得到变应原的50%抑制率分别为(μg/mL):a为8.5, b为9.4, c为7.0, d为3.7。 结论 液氮中研磨+超声破碎能够得到较高的蛋白质含量及更多的蛋白质组分。

Abstract: objective In order to find one of the best methods to make the extraction of alternaria alternate, in this study, we made different methods to compare the influence on the extraction allergen. Methods Alternaria alternate was gotten from the air and identified by Chinese Academy of Sciences, cultured under 26℃ for four weeks. Protein extracted by different methods and its concentration was determined using the Bradford assay, its bioactivity was tested by RAST inhibition, and residual proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Result The extraction methods, ranging from grinder(a), grinder plus ultrasonic(b), ground with liquid nitrogen(c) and liquid nitrogen plus ultrasonic(d). The concentration of protein extractions were as follows (g/ml): a was 0.44±0.04;b was 0.75±0.03;c was 0.72±0.03 and d was 1.29 ±0.05. From SDS-PAGE, we could find that we got the most component in the extraction by liquid nitrogen plus ultrasonic. From RAST, 50% inhibition as follows(μg/ml): a was 8.5, b was 9.4, c was 7.0,d was 3.7. Conclusion: Ground with liquid nitrogen plus disintegration by ultrasonic was the most effective method.