聚醚醚酮/58S生物活性玻璃骨植入材料的成骨活性

基础医学与临床 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 209-213.

聚醚醚酮/58S生物活性玻璃骨植入材料的成骨活性

刘吕花¹, 郑延延^1*, 张丽芳², 熊成东²

1.川北医学院基础医学院, 四川南充 637000;
2.中国科学院成都有机化学研究所, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2020-06-27 修回日期:2020-08-24 出版日期:2021-02-05 发布日期:2021-01-19
通讯作者: ^*yanyzheng@163.com
基金资助:
南充市市校科技战略合作专项资金项目(18SXHZ0114,19SXHZ0246)

Osteogenic activity of polyetheretherketone/58S bioactive glasses bone implant

LIU Lyu-hua¹, ZHENG Yan-yan^1*, ZHANG Li-fang², XIONG Cheng-dong²

1. School of Basic Medical Sciences, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000;
2. Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2020-06-27 Revised:2020-08-24 Online:2021-02-05 Published:2021-01-19
Contact: ^*yanyzheng@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨聚醚醚酮/58S生物活性玻璃(PEEK/58S)骨植入材料的成骨活性。方法 MG-63成骨细胞在PEEK和PEEK/58S表面培养一段时间后,扫描电镜(SEM)观察MG-63成骨细胞的黏附铺展状态;CCK-8 法检测MG-63成骨细胞的增殖活性;碱性磷酸酶(ALP) 活性检测评价MG-63 成骨细胞的成骨分化能力;实时荧光定量 PCR(RT-qPCR)检测成骨分化相关基因 ALP、BMP-2、COL-I、OCN、OPN mRNA表达。PEEK和PEEK/58S植入大鼠胫骨近端12周后,组织学染色和生物力学拔出实验评价骨植入材料与周围骨组织之间的骨整合能力。结果与纯PEEK相比,PEEK/58S更有利于MG-63成骨细胞的黏附铺展,能显著改善MG-63成骨细胞的增殖活性和ALP活性(P＜0.05),显著促进ALP、BMP-2、COL-I、OCN、OPN mRNA的表达(P＜0.05)。PEEK/58S比纯PEEK表现出更好的骨整合能力。结论 PEEK/58S骨植入材料能显著改善成骨细胞的黏附、铺展、增殖与成骨分化活性,增强其与周围骨组织之间的骨整合能力,有望作为新型骨植入材料用于临床。

关键词: 聚醚醚酮, 58S生物活性玻璃, 生物活性, 成骨活性, 骨整合

Abstract: Objective To explore the osteogenic activity of polyetheretherketone/58S bioactive glasses (PEEK/58S) as a kind of bone implant. Methods MG-63 osteoblasts were cultured on PEEK and PEEK/58S surfaces for predetermined time. Then MG-63 osteoblast attachment and spreading condition were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The proliferation activity of MG-63 osteoblast was evaluated by CCK-8 (cell counting kit). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured to determine the osteogenic differentiation of MG-63 osteoblast. The mRNA expression levels of osteogenesis-related genes ALP, BMP-2, COL-I, OCN and OPN were detected using real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. Osseointegration of PEEK and PEEK/58S bone implant was evaluated by histological analysis and biomechanical pull-out tests after implantation in a rat tibia model for 12 weeks. Results Compared with the PEEK, the adhesion and spreading of MG-63 osteoblast was more favorable. The proliferation activity and ALP activity of MG-63 osteoblast was significantly promoted (P＜0.05). Also, the mRNA expression of ALP, BMP-2, COL-I, OCN and OPN was significantly up-regulated (P＜0.05). In vivo experiments showed that PEEK/58S exhibited better osseointegration than pure PEEK. Conclusions PEEK/58S bone implant significantly improves the attachment, spreading, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast and enhances the peri-implant osseointegration, so it is a potential novel orthopedic material for clinical use.

Key words: polyetheretherketone, 58S bioactive glasses, bioactivity, osteogenic activity, osseointegration

中图分类号:

R318.08

刘吕花, 郑延延, 张丽芳, 熊成东. 聚醚醚酮/58S生物活性玻璃骨植入材料的成骨活性[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2021, 41(2): 209-213.

LIU Lyu-hua, ZHENG Yan-yan, ZHANG Li-fang, XIONG Cheng-dong. Osteogenic activity of polyetheretherketone/58S bioactive glasses bone implant[J]. Basic & Clinical Medicine, 2021, 41(2): 209-213.

参考文献

[1] Buck E, Li H, Cerruti M. Surface modification strategies to improve the osseointegration of poly(etheretherketone) and its composites [J]. Macromol Biosci, 2020,20:1900271.doi: 10.1002/mabi.201900271.
[2] Mishra S, Chowdhary R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: a systematic review [J]. Clin Implant Dent R, 2019,21:208-222.
[3] Knaus J, Schaffarczyk D, Cölfen H. On the future design of bio-inspired polyetheretherketone dental implants [J]. Macromol Biosci, 2020,20:1900239. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201900239.
[4] 刘吕花, 郑延延, 张丽芳, 等. 硬组织植入聚醚醚酮表面生物活性改性研究[J]. 中国塑料, 2018,32:7-18.
[5] 刘吕花, 郑延延, 张丽芳, 等. 硬组织植入生物活性聚醚醚酮复合材料[J]. 化学进展, 2017,29:50-58.
[6] Mesquita-Guimarães J, Ramos L, Detsch R, et al. Evaluation of in vitro properties of 3D micro-macro porous zirconia scaffolds coated with 58S bioactive glass using MG-63 osteoblast-like cells [J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2019,39:2545-2558.
[7] Dasgupta S, Maji K, Nandi SK. Investigating the mechanical, physiochemical and osteogenic properties in gelatin-chitosan-bioactive nanoceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: in vitro and in vivo [J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2019,94:713-728.
[8] 郑延延, 刘吕花, 韩崇涛, 等. 聚醚醚酮/碳纳米管/生物活性玻璃复合材料的成骨细胞相容性研究[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2017,32:484-487.
[9] Kurtz SM. PEEK biomaterials handbook (Second Edition) [M] //Poulsson AHC, Eglin D, Geoff Richards R, Surface modification techniques of PEEK, including plasma surface treatment, Andrew Publishing, 2019:179-201.
[10] Baino F, Fiume E, Barberi J, et al. Processing methods for making porous bioactive glass-based scaffolds—a state-of-the-art review [J]. Int J Appl Ceram Tech, 2019,16:1762-1796.
[11] Kaur G, Kumar V, Baino F, et al. Bretcanu. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: state-of-the-art review and future challenges [J]. Mat Sci Eng C, 2019,104:109895. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109895.
[12] Li J, Qian S, Ning C, et al. rBMSC and bacterial responses to isoelastic carbon fiber-reinforced poly(ether-ether-ketone) modified by zirconium implantation [J]. J Mater Chem B, 2016,4:96-104.