基础医学与临床 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 933-937.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

运用组学手段探索EBV相关性与非相关性胃癌的可能差异分子

李北芳1,高霞2,张朦琦1,葛赛3,李忠武1,沈琳1,高静3   

  1. 1. 北京大学肿瘤医院
    2. 山东省烟台市莱阳中心医院
    3. 北京肿瘤医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-12 修回日期:2018-04-27 出版日期:2018-07-05 发布日期:2018-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 高静 E-mail:gaojing_pumc@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目

Exploration of possible different molecules between EBV associated and non-associated gastric cancer by omics

  • Received:2018-03-12 Revised:2018-04-27 Online:2018-07-05 Published:2018-06-29
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program

摘要: 目的 运用组学手段探索 EBV相关性胃癌(EBVaGC)与EBV非相关性胃癌(EBVnGC)间的分子差异,为EBVaGC治疗选择提供依据。方法 显色原位杂交检测胃癌患者手术标本和移植瘤组织EBV-RNA状态。靶向捕获测序和蛋白质谱分析EBV阳性和阴性胃癌组织中差异分子,免疫组织化学验证组织中PD-L1的表达。结果 与EBVnGC相比,EBVaGC中存在PIK3CA高突变率和TP53低突变率。EBVaGC中转录后调控分子表达上调而代谢和氧化磷酸化分子下调。PD-L1在EBV阳性移植瘤中表达显著升高(76.92% vs 25.00%;P<0.05)。结论 EBV相关性与非相关性胃癌在基因变异和蛋白表达上存在很大差别,这为后续深入探索EBVaGC发生的分子机制及提出治疗策略提供依据。

关键词: EBVaGC, 分子特征, PD-L1, 免疫治疗

Abstract: Objective EBV associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC), also called EBV positive gastric cancer had been paid much attention due to the possible suitable group for immunotherapy, which was different with EBV non-associated gastric cancer (EBVnGC) in various characteristics. This study aims to explore the molecular differences between them by omics in order to provide a basis for treatment options. Methods Chromogenic in situ hybridization was used to detect EBV-RNA status of surgical specimens and PDXs from patients. Targeted capture sequencing and protein mass spectrometry were implented to analyze the different molecules, further verify the PD-L1 expression by immunochemistry in EBV positive and negative tissues. Results Compared with EBVnGC, the higher PIK3CA mutation rate and lower TP53 mutation rate were detected in EBVaGC. Post-transcriptional regulation molecules were up-regulated and molecules associated with metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation were down-regulated in EBVaGC. PD-L1 expression in EBV positive PDXs was significantly higher than that in EBV negative (76.92% vs 25.0%, P<0.05). Conclusions There is a great difference between EBVaGC and EBVnGC on genetic variation and expression, which provides the basis for further exploration of the molecular mechanism and treatment strategy of EBVaGC.

Key words: EBVaGC, Molecular characteristics, PD-L1, Immunotherapy

中图分类号: