基础医学与临床 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 918-922.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

手把手传授与录像演示在胎头吸引器助产教学中的效果评估

钟逸锋, 宋英娜*, 汤萍萍, 尹婕   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 妇产科,北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-08 修回日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2021-06-05 发布日期:2021-05-31
  • 通讯作者: *songyingna@pumch.cn

Evaluation of hands-on instruction versus video demonstration for vacuum delivery training

ZHONG Yi-feng, SONG Ying-na*, TANG Ping-ping, YIN Jie   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China
  • Received:2021-03-08 Revised:2021-04-16 Online:2021-06-05 Published:2021-05-31
  • Contact: *songyingna@pumch.cn

摘要: 目的 评价两种教学方法在胎头吸引器助产模拟培训中的效果。方法 将49名住院医师随机分为两组,一组有导师现场讲解并手把手演示操作(简称“导师组”),另一组通过录像观看理论讲解和演示操作(简称“录像组”)。两组均在课前和课后进行自信心问卷调查,前者在听导师讲解课件后、后者在观看录像后进行理论笔试,最后进行实际操作并采用客观结构化的技能考核评估体系评分。结果 在课后的问卷调查中,导师组比录像组对模拟培训重要性的评价更高(4.96±0.20 vs 4.68±0.48,P<0.05);在笔试的环节,导师组的得分显著高于录像组(83.00±7.18 vs 70.56±10.37,P<0.001);实践操作评分方面,导师组在检查设备完整性(0.96±0.20 vs 0.52±0.51,P<0.01)、俯屈点的正确放置(0.50±0.51 vs 0.08±0.28, P< 0.01)和客观总分(6.79±1.02 vs 5.32±0.95,P<0.001)明显优于录像组。导师组在放置胎吸前后检查软组织受夹(0.63±0.50 vs 0.32±0.48,P<0.05)方面优于录像组。结论 导师组手把手教学的模拟培训效果总体优于录像组,两组均能增强学员学习和运用助产技能的自信心。

关键词: 模拟教学, 阴道手术助产, 客观结构化技能考核评估, 胎头吸引器助产

Abstract: Objective To evaluate two methods applied to simulation training of vacuum delivery. Methods A total of 49 residents were randomly divided into two groups. One group was given on-site instruction by directors and hands-on demonstration (referred to as “tutor group”) and the other group was given demonstration through video (referred to as “video group”). Before and after the training, the two groups were surveyed with a self-confidence questionnaire. Written examination was implemented and compared results of group trained by vedio demonstration and the group of on-site instruction by tutors. The practical operation was evaluated by the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). Results The on-site instructed group had a significantly higher score than that of the video group (4.96±0.20 vs 4.68±0.48, P<0.05). The score of written examination of on-site instructed group was significantly higher than that of the video group (83.00±7.18 vs 70.56±10.37, P<0.001). In the OSATS, the score of equipment integrity in on-site instrcted group was significantly higher (0.96±0.20 vs 0.52±0.51 P<0.01), the correct placement of the flexion point (0.50±0.51 vs 0.08±0.28, P<0.01) and the Objective total score (6.79±1.02 vs 5.32±0.95, P<0.001) of on-site instructed group were all The same phenomenon was also found in the soft tissue clamping (0.63±0.50 vs 0.32±0.48, P<0.05). Conclusions The on-site and tutor instructed simulation training has shown a better outcome comparing to the video demonstration . However,both groups can enhance the students'confidence in learning and using operative vaginal delivery skills.

Key words: simulation training, operative vaginal delivery, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills, vacuum delivery

中图分类号: