基础医学与临床 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 671-674.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

唇腺病理阳性判定方法对干燥综合征的诊断价值

李娅1,费允云2,张文3,赵岩4,张奉春1   

  1. 1. 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 风湿免疫科
    2. 北京协和医院内科
    3. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院 风湿免疫科
    4. 北京协和医院风湿免疫科
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-11 修回日期:2013-04-24 出版日期:2013-06-05 发布日期:2013-05-29
  • 通讯作者: 张奉春 E-mail:zhangfccra@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家十一五科技支撑计划;卫生部行业基金

Value of positive labial salivary glands pathology results in diagnosing Sj?gren’s syndrome

  • Received:2013-04-11 Revised:2013-04-24 Online:2013-06-05 Published:2013-05-29

摘要: 目的 探讨不同判定方法得出的唇腺病理阳性结果对干燥综合征(SS)诊断的影响。方法 收集2009年1月~2010年10月北京协和医院风湿免疫科诊断为SS,且唇腺病理阳性的患者21例,其中10例唇腺标本符合灶性淋巴细胞浸润性唾液腺炎(FLS)表现,灶性指数(FS)≥1(A组),余11例唇腺标本中见到≥50个淋巴细胞于间质聚集(B组)。收集患者临床资料,采用独立样本t检验、卡方检验评价不同检测方法得出的唇腺病理阳性结果对SS患者疾病活动和脏器损伤的影响。结果 1)A组患者关节痛发病率显著高于B组(p<0.01),其他临床特征间无差异。2)A组患者左眼BUT低于B组,左眼角膜染色着色斑数目高于B组,左眼角膜染色阳性率高于B组(均p<0.05)。3)两组患者高滴度ANA、抗SSA抗体、抗SSB抗体阳性率无差异。结论 两种判定方法得出的唇腺病理阳性结果对SS的诊断无明显差异。

关键词: 原发性干燥综合征, 唇腺病理, 灶性淋巴细胞浸润性唾液腺炎, 灶性指数

Abstract: Objective To detect the effect of positive labial salivary glands pathology results derived from different methods for diagnosis of Sj?gren’s syndrome(SS). Methods From January 2009 to October 2010, 21 patients with SS and positive labial salivary glands pathology were studied. 10 of the biopsies were focal lymphocytic sialadenitis (FLS), with focus score (FS) ≥1 (group A). The presence of focal infiltrates of lymphocytes in labial gland interstitial tissue was defined as positive in the other 11 biopsies (group B). Clinical data were collected, and student's t-test, chi-square test were used to evaluate the effect of positive labial glands pathology results derived from different methods for diagnosis of SS. Results 1) The positive rate of arthralgia was significantly higher in group A than group B (p<0.01). 2) Group A’s left eye BUT was lower than group B, and the number of corneal fluorescein staining spot was more than group B, while the positive rate of left corneal staining was higher than group B (p<0.05). 3) There was no difference between two groups in positive rates of high titer ANA and anti-SSA/SSB antibodies. Conclusion The labial salivary glands pathology derived from the two different methods had no obvious difference in diagnosing SS.

Key words: primary sj?gren’s syndrome, labial salivary glands pathology, FLS, FS

中图分类号: