基础医学与临床 ›› 2008, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 774-777.

• 临床园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

丙泊酚联合不同剂量咪达唑仑在长时间显微外科手术患者中的镇静

张高峰 李刚 许永光   

  1. 山东大学山东省立医院
  • 收稿日期:2007-11-15 修回日期:2008-04-15 出版日期:2008-07-25 发布日期:2008-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 张高峰

The Sedation of Propofol Combined with Midazolam in Patients undergoing Long-time Microsurgical Operation

Gao-feng ZHANG, Gang LI, Yong-guang XU   

  • Received:2007-11-15 Revised:2008-04-15 Online:2008-07-25 Published:2008-07-25
  • Contact: Gao-feng ZHANG,

摘要: 目的:以听觉诱发电位指数(AAI)为监测指标,观察丙泊酚联合不同剂量咪达唑仑在长时间显微外科手术患者中镇静效果。方法:40例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级在神经阻滞麻醉下行显微外科手术患者,随机分成四组,每组10例。Ⅰ组生理盐水2ml,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ组咪达唑仑分别给予0.01mg/kg, 0.02mg/kg, 0.04mg/kg, 1min后用微量泵持续静注丙泊酚300~500mg/h。同时Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ组分别按照0.01mg/(kg•h), 0.02mg/(kg•h),0.04mg/(kg•h)泵入咪达唑仑。待AAI降到40(镇静诱导),调整丙泊酚用量使AAI维持在30~45,维持镇静5h。记录镇静诱导及镇静维持时丙泊酚用量。5h后停止镇静用药,记录苏醒时间(从停止给药到患者睁眼),术中知晓情况。结果:以AAI30~45为镇静目标,四组患者OAA/S评分均在0~1分。镇静诱导Ⅱ~Ⅳ组比Ⅰ组时间缩短,丙泊酚用药减少。镇静维持丙泊酚用量Ⅰ、Ⅱ组都高于Ⅲ、Ⅳ组,但Ⅲ、Ⅳ组没有明显差别。苏醒时间Ⅳ组明显长于其它三组。结论:对于长时间手术患者的镇静,丙泊酚或联合咪达唑仑均能达到良好的镇静效果,二者联合应用的最佳剂量是镇静诱导时给予咪达唑仑0.02mg/kg,镇静维持时泵入丙泊酚同时咪达唑仑按照0.02mg/(kg•h)泵入。

关键词: 丙泊酚, 咪达唑仑, AAI, 联合用药, 长时间镇静

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the sedation effect of propofol combined with different dose of midazolam in patients undergoing long-time microsurgery taken auditory evoked potential index (AAI) as an end point. Methods:Forty ASA I~II patients were randomly divided into 4 groups. Normal saline(NS) 2ml for group Ⅰ, midazolam 0.01mg/kg, 0.02mg/kg , 0.04mg/kg for GroupⅡ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ separately. 1 min after given NS or midazolam, propofol was infused at a rate of 300~500mg/h combined with midazolam at a rate of 0.01mg/(kg•h), 0.02mg/(kg•h), 0.04mg/(kg•h) for GroupⅡ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ separately. After the AAI reduced to 40(sedation induction), adjusted the infusion rate of propofol to keep AAI at the level of 30~45, and sustained the level by infusing propofol and midazolam for 5 hours. The dosage of propofol required for sedation induction and sedation sustaining were recorded. 5 hours later, stopped the infusion, and recorded the analepsia time and whether patients had awareness during the operation. Results:According to the sedation target level of AAI30~45, the OAA/S score of all patients in the four groups could reach 0~1.The induction period was obviously shortened and the propofol dosage was dramatically reduced in Group Ⅱ~Ⅳ compared with GroupⅠ. In the stage of sustaining the sedation , the dosage of Propofol in both GroupⅠandⅡ were used more than that in Group Ⅲ and Ⅳ, however there were no significant difference between Group Ⅲ and Ⅳ. The analepsia time in Group Ⅳ was dramatically longer than in the other groups. Conclusion:The patients could got a satisfactory sedation by propofol or combined with midazolam during long-time microsurgical operation .The optimal compatibility program was that midazloam was administered 0.02mg/kg for sedation induction, and propofol was infused combined with midazolam 0.02mg/(kg•h) when sedation sustaining.

Key words: Propofol, Midazolam, AAI, Combined medication, Long-time sedation