三项国家药品监督管理局微生物能力验证结果分析

陆继伟, 范一灵, 陈祝康, 谷广志, 顾颂青, 杨美成, 高晓明, 项新华

中国药学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3) : 308-312.

PDF(1106 KB)
PDF(1106 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3) : 308-312. DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2025.03.014
论著

三项国家药品监督管理局微生物能力验证结果分析

  • 陆继伟1, 范一灵1,2, 陈祝康1, 谷广志1, 顾颂青1*, 杨美成2,3, 高晓明4, 项新华4*
作者信息 +

Analysis of Results of Three NMPA's Microbial Proficiency Testing Programs

  • LU Jiwei1, FAN Yiling1,2, CHEN Zhukang1, GU Guangzhi1, GU Songqing1*, YANG Meicheng2,3, GAO Xiaoming4, XIANG Xinhua4*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 通过对NIFDC-PT-288《药品中金黄色葡萄球菌检验能力验证计划》、NIFDC-PT-340《药品中需氧菌总数计数能力验证计划》和NIFDC-PT-446《药品中霉菌和酵母菌总数计数能力验证计划》能力结果的分析研究,评价全国范围内参加实验室的药品微生物检验水平,使监管机构掌握药品检验实验室的微生物能力状况,提高实验室能力水平。方法 从结果满意率、发现问题和技术要点对结果进行了分析;从实验室类型、实验室数量、能力情况对实验室能力进行了分析。结果 省级食品药品检验机构结果满意率为95.7%(NIFDC-PT-288)、86.4%(NIFDC-PT-340)和100.0%(NIFDC-PT-446);地市(县、区)级食品药品检验机构结果满意率为95.5%(NIFDC-PT-288)、83.9%(NIFDC-PT-340)和92.5%(NIFDC-PT-446),企业实验室结果满意率为86.7%(NIFDC-PT-288)、65.7%(NIFDC-PT-340)和80.2%(NIFDC-PT-446),其他类型实验室结果满意率为100.0%(NIFDC-PT-288)、61.5%(NIFDC-PT-340)和86.7%(NIFDC-PT-446)。结论 三项微生物能力验证项目的成功开展,为实验室提供了有效的外部质量控制手段,也为监管机构掌握全国药品实验室微生物检测的能力状况提供了一手资料,药品检验实验室微生物定性检测能力较好,微生物的定量检测能力有待提高。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To analyze the results of three NMPA's Microbial Proficiency Testing Programs, NIFDC-PT-288, NIFDC-PT-340, and NIFDC-PT-446, to evaluate the microbiological testing abilities of laboratories nationwide in drug detection, thus the regulatory agencies can learn the microbiological proficiency status of drug inspection laboratories and the laboratories can improve the microbiological detection ability. METHODS The results of the three proficiency testing programs were analyzed regarding the satisfaction rate, identified problems, and key technical points, and the laboratory types, number of laboratories and capability of the laboratories participating the three proficiency testing projects were analyzed. RESULTS The result satisfaction rates of provincial food and drug inspection institutions were 95.7% (NIFDC-PT-288), 86.4% (NIFDC-PT-340) and 100.0% (NIFDC-PT-446), while the satisfaction rates of municipal food and drug control institutions were 95.5% (NIFDC-PT-288), 83.9% (NIFDC-PT-340) and 92.5% (NIFDC-PT-446), respectively. The satisfaction rates of enterprise laboratory were 86.7% (NIFDC-PT-288), 65.7% (NIFDC-PT-340) and 80.2% (NIFDC-PT-446), respectively. The satisfaction rates of other types of laboratories were 100.0% (NIFDC-PT-288), 61.5% (NIFDC-PT-340) and 86.7% (NIFDC-PT-446), respectively. CONCLUSION The successful implementation of the three microbiological proficiency testing programs has provided the laboratories with effective external quality control means, and it also provides the first-hand reference for regulatory authorities on the microbiological testing capability of nationwide drug laboratories. The qualitative microorganism testing ability of drug laboratories is basically good, while the quantitative microorganism testing ability needs to be improved.

关键词

微生物能力验证计划 / 金黄色葡萄球菌 / 需氧菌总数计数 / 霉菌和酵母菌总数计数 / 能力结果分析

Key words

microbiological proficiency testing program / Staphylococcus aureus / total aerobic microbial count / total molds and yeasts count / proficiency result analysis

引用本文

导出引用
陆继伟 , 范一灵 , 陈祝康 , 谷广志 , 顾颂青 , 杨美成 , 高晓明 , 项新华. 三项国家药品监督管理局微生物能力验证结果分析[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2025, 60(3): 308-312 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2025.03.014
LU Jiwei , FAN Yiling , CHEN Zhukang , GU Guangzhi , GU Songqing , YANG Meicheng , GAO Xiaoming , XIANG Xinhua. Analysis of Results of Three NMPA's Microbial Proficiency Testing Programs[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2025, 60(3): 308-312 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2025.03.014
中图分类号: R917   

参考文献

[1] CNAS-CL03: 2010. Accreditation Criteria for Proficiency Testing Providers (能力验证提供者认可准则)[S].2016.
[2] HAO Y L, XUE Y G. Discussion on the role of proficiency testing in laboratory quality management[J]. Guide Chin Med (中国医药指南),2019,17(33):385-386.
[3] MENG J H. The role of proficiency testing in improving laboratory testing level[J]. Chin Qual Super(中国质量技术监督),2015(8):60-61.
[4] LI S H, WANG S Y, FAN B Q, et al. On the management strategies for improving the detection capabilities of pharmaceutical microbiology laboratories[J]. Chin J Health Lab Technol(中国卫生检验杂志),2015 (16):2822-2824.
[5] MAO Y, YAN L. Benefits analysis of the laboratories participation in proficiency testing programs[J]. J Food Saf Qual(食品安全质量检测学报),2014,5(9):2958-2961.
[6] FAN Y L, LI F, YANG Y, et al. Sample preparation and analysis of proficiency test containing Staphylococcus aureus with drug matrix[J]. Shanghai J Prev Med(上海预防医学),2022,34(3): 279-282.
[7] YANG Y, FAN Y L, LI F, et al. Development and application of the proficiency test program for Staphylococcus aureus detection in pharmaceuticals[J]. Chin J Pharm (中国医药工业杂志),2020 ( 9):1184-1188.
[8] XIAO H, DAI H, ZHOU F Y, et al. Proficiency testing of drug microbiological testing laboratories based on the total aerobic microbial count of Banlangen Granules[J]. China Pharm (中国药业),2021 (13):60-63.
[9] GEN Z H, XU T, DONG X, et al. Exploration on methods for improving the accuracy of mold and yeast count results[J]. Food Saf Qual Detect J (食品安全质量检测学报),2020 (17):6251-6254.
[10] Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Technical Guide for Analysis and Detection in Chinese Pharmacopoeia (中国药典分析检测技术指南)[M].Beijing: China Medical Science Press, 2017:564-586.
[11] TANG M L, WU S Q, YANG Y L, et al. Results and analysis of proficiency testing for total number of aerobic bacteria[J]. Qual Saf Insp Test(质量安全与检验检测),2022,32(3):125-127.
[12] YANG W F, ZHANG H W, LI W, et al. Analysis of risk points and countermeasures for suspicious or unsatisfactory results of food and drug proficiency test[J]. Chin Pharm Aff(中国药事), 2018, 32(4):480-484.
[13] LIU Y D, XIANG X H, WANG D, et al. The construction and implementation of proficiency testing service platform in drug control system[J]. Chin Pharm Aff (中国药事), 2018,32(6):737-742.
PDF(1106 KB)

47

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/