中国药学杂志
    
           首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告服务  |  会议信息  |  联系我们  | 
�й�ҩѧ��־ 2012, Vol. 47 Issue (22) :1844-1848    DOI:
���� ����Ŀ¼ | ����Ŀ¼ | ������� | �߼����� << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
��ŵ�������׻������������峦���ն���ѧ�о�
��С��1��������1������»1����ѧ��1��2��������1������3���±���3
1.�Ͼ���ҵ��ѧҩѧԺ���Ͼ� 211816��2. �Ͼ���ҵ��ѧ���ϻ�ѧ���̹����ص�ʵ���ң��Ͼ� 210009��3.���ϴ�ѧҽѧԺ�����д�ҽԺѪҺ�ƣ� �Ͼ� 210009
SUN Xiao-hu1�� HUANG Qin-qin1�� WANG Yong-lu1�� LI Xue-ming1��2*��FENG Qin-xin1��LIU Ran3�� CHEN Bao-an3

Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
ժҪ Ŀ�� �����ŵ�������׻�������С�������ն���ѧ�����������ŵ����ԭ��ҩ���жԱȡ����� ���ô������峦����ʵ�飬����ֹ��ȷ��ⶨ�Ӻ�Ũ�ȣ�HPLCͬʱ�ⶨ��ŵ���ؼ���ŵ�����Ũ�ȡ���� ��ŵ�������׻�����������С�����������ʳ���������ԭ��ҩ��������50~200 μg·mL-1�ڵ�Kaֵ���������ֲ��䣬��pH 6.0��6.5��7.4�����µ������������������Բ��죬��ŵ�������׻�������ʮ��ָ�����ճ����س����᳦��Kaֵ�ֱ�Ϊ(0.373±0.002 1)h-1��(0.329±0.000 8)h-1��(0.362±0.001 4)h-1��(0.347±0.007 9)h-1������ ��ŵ�������׻������������������нϺ����գ���һ������ѧ���̣����ջ���Ϊ������ɢ��
Service
�ѱ����Ƽ�������
�����ҵ����
�������ù�����
Email Alert
RSS
�����������
����
������
����»
��ѧ��
������
����
�±���
�ؼ����� ��ŵ�������׻�����   ���ն���ѧ   ���峦����     
Abstract�� OBJECTIVE To investigate the absorption kinetics of fenofibrate nanosuspension in rat intestine��METHODS The intestine of rats was cannulated for in situ recirculation��UV spectrophotometry was used to determine the concentrations of phenol red while HPLC was used to determine the concentrations of��fenofibrate and fenofibric acid��RESULTS The fenofibrate nanosuspension exhibited substantial absorption enhancement in entire intestine compared to the crude drug solution��The difference in drug absorption at concentrations from 50 to 200 μg·mL-1 between fenofibrate nanosuspension and crude drug solution was not significant. Different pH values of K-R buffer had no effect on the intestinal permeability (Papp)and absorption rate constant (Ka)for the two dosage forms. The absorption rate constants (h-1)of fenofibrate nanosuspension at duodenum��jejunum��ileum and colon were (0.373±0.002 1)��(0.329±0.000 8)��(0.362±0.001 4)�� and (0.347±0.007 9)�� respectively��CONCLUSION Fenofibrate nanosuspension can be well absorbed in the whole intestinal segments��The absorption of��fenofibrate nanosuspension in rat intestine is a first order process with passive diffusion mechanism.
Keywords�� fenofibrate nanosuspension,   absorption kinetics,   in situ intestine absorption     
�ո�����: 2011-12-01;
��������:

������Ȼ��ѧ����������Ŀ(81170492�� ������ʡ��У��Ȼ��ѧ�о�������Ŀ10KJB350002�����Ͼ���ҵ��ѧ���ϻ�ѧ���̹����ص�ʵ���ҿ��ſ������������Ŀ(KL10-13��

���߼��: ��С�����У�˶ʿ�о��� �о�����ҩ���Ƽ� ͨѶ���ߣ���ѧ�����У���ʿ������ �о����򻺿����Ƽ���΢����ҩϵͳ�о� Tel(025)58139399 E-mail��xuemingli@njut.edu.cn
���ñ���:   
��С��, ������, ����»�� .��ŵ�������׻������������峦���ն���ѧ�о�[J]  �й�ҩѧ��־, 2012,V47(22): 1844-1848
SUN Xiao-Hu, HUANG Qin-Qin, WANG Yong-Lu etc .Absorption Kinetics of Fenofibrate Nanosuspension in Rat Intestine in Situ[J]  Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2012,V47(22): 1844-1848
��
[1] HANAFY A��SPAHN-LANGGUTH H��VERGNAULT G��et al��Pharmacokinetic evaluation of oral fenofibrate nanosuspensions and SLN in comparison to conventional suspensions of micronized drug[J]��Adv Drug Delivery Rev��2007��59 (6)��419-426��
[2] XUE M L��LI G��YUAN L X��et al��Preparation of fenofibrate nanosuspension and study of its pharmacokinetic behavior in rats[J]��Drug Dev Indust Pharm��2009��35��7����827-833��
[3] SINKO P J��PATEL N R��HU P��Site-specific oral absorption of didanosine�� In situ characterization and correlation with extent of absorption in vivo[J]��Int J Pharm��1994��109(2)�� 125-133.
[4] YUAN H Z��MICHAEL H��ABRAHAM��et al. Evaluation of rat in testinal absorption data and correlation with human intestinal absorption[ J]. Eur J Med Chem��2003��38(3)�� 233.
[1] �ż̷ң����ڣ�Ī�ã�лС����������.��������֬����ı������������о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2012,47(21): 1736-1740
[2] ������;��ѧ��;����;����.�������嵥�򳦹�עģ���о���������ջ��ƺ����ն���ѧ[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2012,47(11): 903-907
[3] ���� ��� ����ΰ ����.���������������峦���ն���ѧ�о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2011,46(24): 1911-1914
[4] ��Ӣ�� ������ ����Ȼ ����ͩ ������ ������.����ݼ��ش������峦���ն���ѧ�о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2010,45(17): 1339-1342
[5] ���޺�;������;����;������ Ming H.����޽��ͪ�໯����Ĵ������峦�����о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2008,43(03): 188-191
[6] �ڰ���;�Թ�ϲ;�ܷ���;ӡ��;¦����;����ѧ .�����΢��������峦���ն���ѧ�о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2007,42(09): 692-694
[7] ����Ҷ;��ͭ��;�Ž�;������;������.����������͡�������峦���ն���ѧ�о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2007,42(08): 617-620
[8] ����;��ѧ��;�ܾ�;���.��������R1���˲�����Rg1�Ĵ������峦���ն���ѧ�о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2006,41(14): 1097-1101
[9] ���Ǹ�;������;������;�Ž�Ԯ.��ҩ�մ������峦���ն���ѧ���о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2006,41(11): 854-857
[10] ������;��ѧ��;������.��ͬ��Է���������յ����-PEG����������С�����ն���ѧ���о�[J]. �й�ҩѧ��־, 2006,41(05): 375-378
Copyright 2010 by �й�ҩѧ��־