国外药物经济学研究方法进展

杨丽娟 甄健存 吴久鸿

中国药学杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (24) : 1978.

PDF(448 KB)
PDF(448 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (24) : 1978.
药物经济学

国外药物经济学研究方法进展

  • 杨丽娟1,甄健存1,吴久鸿2*
作者信息 +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 概述国外药物经济学研究方法的进展,为我国药物经济学研究提供参考。方法 以近年来国外发表的文章为依据,进行分析、整理和归纳。结果 从分析方法、模型研究方法、成本考虑、结果测量及分析、预算影响分析方面,概述了近年来国外药物经济学研究方法的进展。结论 药物经济学研究的正确性和适宜性直接影响研究结果的准确性和可信性。通过了解国外药物经济学研究方法的进展,能为我国开展高质量的药物经济学研究提供参考。

关键词

药物经济学 / 研究方法

引用本文

导出引用
杨丽娟 甄健存 吴久鸿. 国外药物经济学研究方法进展[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2010, 45(24): 1978

参考文献


[1] JOSEPH L, MICHAEL D, DENNIS F, et al. Retaining and enhancing the QALY [J]. Value Health, 2009, 12(sup 1):1-4,18-26.
[2] HUFFORD M. Methodological advances in the assessment of quality of life in clinical trials [J]. Value Health, 2008, 4(2): 181-182.
[3] SCOTT R, RICHARD W, ANDREW B, et al. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA task force report [J]. Value Health, 2005, 8 (5): 521-534.
[4] MILTON C W, BERNIE O B, JOHN H, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices-modeling studies [J]. Value Health, 2003, 6(1): 9-17.
[5] KARNON J, GOYDER E, TAPPENDEN P, et al. A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2007,11(52):Ⅲ-Ⅳ,Ⅸ-Ⅺ.
[6] PELHAM B, STIRLING B, SUZANNE R. Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach [J]. J Health Services Research & Policy, 2004,9(2): 110-118.
[7] JOHN A V, KEENER W H. A primer on dynamic optimization and optimal control in pharmacoeconomics[J]. Value Health, 2006, 9(2):106-113.
[8] BENGT L, GO R S K, NILS-OLOV S L. On future non-medical costs in economic evaluations[J]. Health Econ, 2008,17(5): 579-591.
[9] DAVID R R, PIETER H M B, JOB A E, et al. Unrelated medical costs in life-years gained[J].Pharmacoeconomics, 2008,26(10):815-830.
[10] LOUIS P G J, PETER J N, PENNIFER E, et al. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR real-world data task force report[J]. Value Health, 2007, 10(5):326-335.
[11] ANKE-PEGGY H, JOHN B W, DANIEL M, et al. Incorporating observational data into the formulary decision-making process-summary of aroundtable discussion[J]. J Managed Care Pharmacy, 2008, 14(3): 302-308.
[12] DYFRIG H, WARREN C, TAMAS K, et al. Methods for integrating medication compliance and persistence in pharmacoeconomic evaluations [J]. Value Health, 2007, 10(6):498-509.
[13] WALLEY T, BRECKENRIDGE A. Pharmacoeconomics comes of age? [J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2008, 84(2):279-280.
[14] DRUMMOND M, BARBIERI M, COOK J, et al. Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR good research practices task force report[J]. Value Health, 2009, 12(4):1-32.
[15] JAMES M M, ANNE R M. The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies issues and challenges ahead[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2006, 24 (10): 937-945.
[16] SCULPHER M J, PANG F S, MANCA A, et al. Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies [J].Health Technol Assess, 2004, 8(49):Ⅲ-Ⅳ.
[17] JOSEPHINE A M, SEAN D S, LIEVEN A, et al. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices-budget impact analysis [J]. Value Health, 2007, 10(5):336-347.
[18] MARSHALL, DEBORAH A, DOUGLAS , et al. Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada [J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2008, 26(6): 477-495.
[19] ORLEWSKA E, GULACSI L. Budget-impact analyses: a critical review of published studies [J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2009, 27(10): 807-827.
[20] WILLIAM F M, MAIWENN A, JALPA A D. The ISPOR good practices for quality improvement of cost-effectiveness research task force report[J]. Value Health, 2009,12(8):1086-1099.
PDF(448 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/