Comparative Studies on Main Effective Components of Cultivated and Wild Cistanche deserticola
XU Rong1, ZHU Wei-cheng2, CHEN Jun 1*, YU Jing1, LIU Tong-ning3
Author information+
1. Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/ National Engineering Laboratory for Breeding of Endangered Medicinal Materials, Beijing 100193, China; 2. Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China; 3. Ningxia Yongning Plantation of Herba Cistanche, Yinchuan 750100, China
{{custom_zuoZheDiZhi}}
{{custom_authorNodes}}
{{custom_bio.content}}
{{custom_bio.content}}
{{custom_authorNodes}}
Collapse
文章历史+
收稿日期
修回日期
出版日期
2011-11-11
2011-11-11
2011-06-15
发布日期
2011-06-15
摘要
目的 研究栽培与野生肉苁蓉(Cistanche deserticola Y. C. Ma苯乙醇苷类化学成分的含量和组成差异,为名贵濒危中药资源肉苁蓉的合理开发和利用提供一定的理论基础。方法 应用高效液相色谱法对栽培与野生肉苁蓉样品进行药典指标成分和指纹图谱分析,利用SPSS统计分析软件和“计算机辅助相似度评价系统”软件进行数据处理。结果 比较发现,栽培样品中松果菊苷含量略高,但与野生样品无显著性差异;野生样品中毛蕊花糖苷的平均含量[(3.15±0.55%]显著高于栽培样品[(1.63±0.55%]。HPLC特征峰的相对含量分布差异导致指纹图谱存在一定差异;计算机辅助相似度评价分析结果显示,栽培肉苁蓉样品间的相似系数均大于0.65,而野生肉苁蓉样品之间的相似系数最低仅0.237,说明野生样品间个体差异大,可能存在的变异类型更加丰富。结论 人工种植对于保证肉苁蓉药材质量的稳定性具有重要作用,应该加强对野生肉苁蓉的引种工作,确保更大范围内的引种以便保存更多的种质资源,这对于肉苁蓉资源保护和可持续利用有着极其重要的意义。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the difference in the composition and contents of the effective components, phenylethanoid glycosides, between cultivated and wild C. deserticola for providing theoretical basis for appropriate development and utilization of the precious and endangered C. deserticola resources. METHODS HPLC method was used to determine the contents of the index components adopted by Chinese pharmacopoeia. With morphology and yield traits, the content data were analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis software. At the same time, chromatographic fingerprints were acquired for similarity evaluation by computer aided similarity evaluation software (CASES. RESULTS The content of echinacoside in the cultivated samples was slightly higher than that in the wild samples, but there was no significant difference. The average content of acteoside [(3.15±0.55%] in the wild samples was significantly higher than that in the cultivated samples [(1.63±0.55%]. The content of each component showed great difference among the samples, which resulted in the differences in their chromatograms. CASES analysis showed that the cultivated samples exhibited higher similarity with coefficient higher than 0.65, but the lowest similarity coefficient between the wild samples was 0.237, indicating greater variability among wild individuals. There might be much more variant diversity in wild C. deserticola. CONCLUSION Cultivation is very important for maintaining the stability of the quality of C. deserticola crude drug. Introduction of germplasm for conservation should be strengthened, and the introduction area should be enlarged, which is quite essential to resource conservation and sustainable development of Cistanche deserticola.
XU Rong;ZHU Wei-cheng;CHEN Jun;YU Jing;LIU Tong-ning.
Comparative Studies on Main Effective Components of Cultivated and Wild Cistanche deserticola[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2011, 46(12): 903-909
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] TU P F, HE Y P, LOU Z C. Herbalogical study on Cistanche deserticola[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志, 1994, 19 (1:3-5. [2] The Endangered Species Import & Export Management Office of The People′s Republic of China, Endangered Species Scientific Commission, P. R. C. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species(CITES: Appendix Ⅱ (濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约:附录Ⅱ [M].2003:41. [3] FU L K. China Plant Red Data Book Rare and Endangered Plants: Vol. Ⅰ(中国植物红皮书:第一卷[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1992:502. [4] JIANG Y, TU P F. Analysis of chemical constituents in Cistanche species [J]. J Chromatogr A, 2009, 1216(11: 1970-1979. [5] XIONG Q B, TEZUKA Y, KANEKO T, et al. Inhibition of nitric oxide by phenylethanoids in activated macrophages [J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2000, 400(1: 137-144. [6] LIN Z J, JIANG N W, ZHU T J, et al. Chrysogenamide A from an endophytic fungus associated with Cistanche deserticola and its neuroprotective effect on SH-SY5Y cells [J]. J Antibiot (Tokyo, 2008, 61(1:81-85. [7] Ch. P(2005 Vol I (中国药典2005年版. 一部[S]. 2005: 90. [8] XIE J N, ZHAO M B, WU F W, et al. Chromatographic fingerprint of Cistanche deserticola by HPLC [J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drug (中草药, 2005, 36(2: 168-172. [9] YANG J H, HU J P, KASIMU R, et al. Studies on fingerprint of phenylethanoid glycosides in cultivated Cistanche salsa [J]. Chin Pharm J (中国药学杂志, 2009, 44(15: 1128-1133. [10] XU R, CHEN J, CHEN S L, et al. AFLP analysis on germplasm resources of cultivated and wild Cistanche deserticola [J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drug (中草药, 2007,38(11: 1703-1707.