基础医学与临床 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 140-143.

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学文献内容质量等级评价体系的探索

郑雯1,王娟1,汤亚娥2,董妍2,马慧群3   

  1. 1. 西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院中国皮肤性病学杂志编辑部
    2. 西安交通大学第二附属医院
    3. 西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-21 修回日期:2017-12-04 出版日期:2019-01-05 发布日期:2018-12-28
  • 通讯作者: 马慧群 E-mail:mahuiqun2003@163.com

Exploration of quality grade evaluation system on medical literature

  • Received:2017-07-21 Revised:2017-12-04 Online:2019-01-05 Published:2018-12-28
  • Contact: MA Hui-qun E-mail:mahuiqun2003@163.com

摘要: 目的 研究医学文献内容质量评价体系的发展历程,为文献的评价提供理论依据,以期指导实验研究的设计。方法 通过阐述西医文献和中医文献的内容等级评价体系,总结医学文献评价体系的优缺点。结果 现存的文献评价的方法及使用的工具各有利弊,尤其是中医文献的评价方法有待进一步完善,应根据研究的类型选择合适的评价体系。结论 医学文献是医学研究的基础,只有高质量的文献才能有利于指导科学研究,评价文献内容的方法及工具是值得大家深入研究并不断完善的。

关键词: 医学文献,评价体系,证据分级

Abstract: Objective Study of the development of medical literature quality evaluation system, to provide theoretical basis for the evaluation of the literature, in order to guide the design of the experimental research. Methods Through the elaboration of literature of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and western medicine literature content level evaluation system, summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of medical literature evaluation system. Results The methods and tools used in the existing literature evaluation, which have advantages and disadvantages, especially in TCM literature the evaluation methods need to be further perfect. It should be based on the type of study to choose the appropriate evaluation system. Conclusions Medical literature is the basis of medical research, only high quality literature is beneficial to guide the scientific research, to evaluate the method of literature content and tools is worthy of our in-depth study and improve.

Key words: Medicine literature,Evaluation system,Evidence classification